Laws, Rules, Regulations & Conscience

Model Answer

Introduction

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) embodies the principles of Justice, Equality, and Impartiality, rooted in Indian culture and ethos. This new legal framework marks a significant departure from the traditional doctrine of punishment towards a more holistic understanding of justice.

Justice

The BNS emphasizes Restorative Justice, drawing inspiration from ancient Indian panchayat systems. Instead of solely focusing on retribution, it promotes reconciliation and healing for both victims and offenders. For instance, Section 4(f) of the BNS incorporates community service as a form of punishment, showcasing this restorative approach. Additionally, the BNS guarantees the right to a fair trial, aligning with Article 21 of the Constitution, which upholds personal liberty as expanded in the Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India case.

Equality

Reflecting B.R. Ambedkar’s vision of an inclusive society, the BNS ensures that legal processes are accessible, particularly for marginalized groups. It enhances gender justice, citing the Vishakha Guidelines to safeguard women’s rights, especially in Section 75, which protects against sexual harassment.

Impartiality

The BNS promotes bias-free judicial processes inspired by the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita, which advocate for fairness and detachment. Section 17 states that acts justified by law are not considered offenses, emphasizing impartiality. Furthermore, it enhances transparency in the judicial system, facilitating public access to court documents, which bolsters trust.

Major Shift Towards Justice

The BNS represents a transition from punitive measures to rehabilitative justice. It encourages correctional programs for minor offenses, advocating for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) rooted in Indian tradition. Victims’ rights are prioritized, ensuring compensation and restoration rather than mere retribution. The BNS also integrates preventive strategies to address crime’s root causes and adopts technological advancements, making the judicial process more efficient and accessible.

In conclusion, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita aspires to modernize India’s criminal justice system, replacing outdated colonial laws with a framework that resonates with contemporary Indian society, ensuring justice that is equitable and impartial.

Model Answer

The Role of Conscience in Ethical Decision-Making

1. Navigating Ethical Dilemmas

Conscience offers moral intuition, especially when individuals face challenging ethical choices involving conflicting principles.

• Example: Edward Snowden, guided by his conscience, exposed government surveillance, prioritizing ethical concerns over legal compliance.
• Fact: Ethical dilemmas often require balancing personal morality with societal norms

2. Promoting Moral Autonomy

Conscience fosters personal free will, empowering individuals to act based on an inner sense of goodness rather than external pressures.

• Example: Sunderlal Bahuguna’s environmental activism for the Himalayas was driven by a moral responsibility to protect nature.
• Fact: Autonomy in moral decision-making is fundamental to ethical philosophy

3. Standing Against Injustice

Conscience inspires ethical resistance to unjust systems or practices.

• Example: Rosa Parks’ refusal to yield her bus seat demonstrated moral conviction against racial injustice.
• Fact: Conscience often fuels movements for civil rights and equality

Limitations of Conscience

1. Subjectivity

Conscience varies among individuals due to differences in beliefs, values, and experiences, leading to inconsistent ethical outcomes.

• Example: Passive euthanasia may be seen as compassionate by some but immoral by others.
• Fact: Ethical subjectivity challenges universal moral standards

2. Cultural and Social Influences

Conscience is shaped by societal norms, which can justify practices that contradict universal ethics.

• Example: Slavery and Sati were historically rationalized by the prevailing conscience of the time.
• Fact: Social conditioning can distort moral judgment.

3. Limited Perspective

A conscience focused on personal interests may neglect broader societal impacts.

• Example: A business leader prioritizing profits over environmental or labor welfare.
• Fact: Narrow perspectives hinder ethical decision-making

4. Vulnerability to Bias

Personal biases and emotions can skew conscience, leading to unfair decisions.

• Example: A journalist’s political beliefs may result in biased reporting.
• Fact: Bias undermines objectivity in ethical actions .

Conclusion

Conscience is indispensable for introspection and moral decision-making but is inherently limited by subjectivity, cultural influences, and biases. To ensure balanced ethical judgments, conscience must be complemented with rational deliberation, societal standards, and legal frameworks.