Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Understanding the Statement Explanation: Define what is meant by “doing a good thing” and the implications of acting within the law. Key Point: Clarify that legality does not equate to ethicality. 2. Examples in the Context of Public Servants A. ...
Differentiating Between Democratic Attitude and Bureaucratic Attitude of Public Servants Democratic Attitude: Public Engagement: Public servants with a democratic attitude prioritize engaging with citizens, valuing public opinion, and ensuring transparency. For example, the Participatory Budgeting iRead more
Differentiating Between Democratic Attitude and Bureaucratic Attitude of Public Servants
Democratic Attitude:
- Public Engagement: Public servants with a democratic attitude prioritize engaging with citizens, valuing public opinion, and ensuring transparency. For example, the Participatory Budgeting initiatives in cities like Porto Alegre involve citizens in budget allocation decisions.
- Accountability: They emphasize accountability and responsiveness to the needs of the community, fostering a participatory approach in governance.
- Flexibility: Democratic public servants are generally more adaptable and open to reforms based on public feedback and evolving societal needs.
Bureaucratic Attitude:
- Hierarchical Approach: A bureaucratic attitude often involves a rigid adherence to established rules and protocols, with less emphasis on public consultation. For example, the traditional procedures in Indian administrative services can sometimes lead to bureaucratic red tape.
- Formality: Bureaucratic attitudes focus on formality and procedural correctness, which can sometimes result in a lack of flexibility and responsiveness.
- Decision-Making: Bureaucratic public servants may have a top-down approach, with decisions being made by higher authorities and limited input from the public.
Recent Example: The Digital India initiative showcases a blend of democratic and bureaucratic attitudes by using technology to improve transparency and citizen engagement, yet it also involves procedural elements typical of bureaucratic systems.
Conclusion: While democratic attitudes emphasize public engagement, flexibility, and accountability, bureaucratic attitudes focus on formality, procedural adherence, and hierarchical decision-making. Both approaches have their roles in effective public administration.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The statement suggests that when public servants engage in actions deemed beneficial, they may take liberties as long as such actions are not explicitly prohibited by law. However, this raises critical questions about the definition of a "good thing" and the ethical implicaRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The statement suggests that when public servants engage in actions deemed beneficial, they may take liberties as long as such actions are not explicitly prohibited by law. However, this raises critical questions about the definition of a “good thing” and the ethical implications of actions that may not be legally restricted.
Body
Upholding the Law
Public servants are entrusted with the responsibility of enforcing laws fairly and ethically. They cannot justify unethical behavior by claiming to pursue good outcomes.
Example: The extrajudicial killing of Sohrabuddin Sheikh involved police officers who acted unlawfully under the guise of maintaining public order. Their actions, justified as serving the greater good, resulted in severe legal and ethical repercussions.
Corruption and Bribery
Public servants must act in the public’s interest, free from corruption. Acceptance of bribes is never justified, regardless of the claimed intentions behind the actions.
Example: In 2012, IRS officer Ashok Kumar Singh was arrested for accepting a bribe of ₹2 lakh to manipulate a tax assessment. His actions, aimed to benefit certain individuals, ultimately undermined public trust.
Misuse of Power
Power should be exercised within legal boundaries. Misusing authority for personal gain, even if perceived as beneficial, erodes public trust.
Example: The Adarsh Housing Society scam involved politicians and bureaucrats who exploited their positions to secure apartments meant for war veterans, undermining ethical governance.
Conflict of Interest
Public servants should avoid personal interests conflicting with their duties.
Example: Former Minister Shashi Tharoor faced scrutiny for alleged conflicts of interest during the IPL controversy, where his involvement in a bidding company raised ethical concerns while he served in a governmental role.
Conclusion
These examples illustrate that public servants must prioritize integrity, transparency, and accountability over perceived good intentions. Upholding ethical standards and the law is essential for fostering trust and promoting good governance in society.
See less