Do you think there is no career/scope in manual testing. What is your opinion on Automation testing.
Debugging code in robotics involves a systematic and thorough approach to identify and resolve issues. Firstly, I begin by understanding the problem through detailed observation of the robot's behavior and error messages. This initial diagnosis helps in pinpointing the potential areas where the probRead more
Debugging code in robotics involves a systematic and thorough approach to identify and resolve issues. Firstly, I begin by understanding the problem through detailed observation of the robot’s behavior and error messages. This initial diagnosis helps in pinpointing the potential areas where the problem might reside.
Next, I check the hardware connections and components to ensure there are no physical issues affecting the software. Once the hardware is verified, I proceed to review the code. I start by examining the most recent changes, as new bugs often stem from recent modifications.
I use logging extensively, adding print statements or using a logging framework to track the robot’s state and the flow of execution. This helps in identifying where the code is deviating from the expected behavior. Simultaneously, I employ debugging tools available in the development environment to step through the code, inspect variables, and monitor the robot’s responses.
If the problem persists, I break down the code into smaller segments, testing each module independently to isolate the faulty section. Collaboration is also key; discussing the issue with colleagues can provide new perspectives and solutions.
Finally, after identifying and fixing the bug, I conduct thorough testing to ensure the solution works across different scenarios, preventing future issues.
See less
Manual testing still holds significant value in the software development lifecycle. It is essential for tasks requiring human judgment, exploratory testing, and usability assessments. Manual testers bring a unique perspective, understanding user behavior and identifying issues that automated scriptsRead more
Manual testing still holds significant value in the software development lifecycle. It is essential for tasks requiring human judgment, exploratory testing, and usability assessments. Manual testers bring a unique perspective, understanding user behavior and identifying issues that automated scripts may overlook. For small projects or projects with frequent changes, manual testing is often more feasible and cost-effective.
However, the industry is progressively shifting towards automation testing due to its efficiency and scalability. Automation testing excels in repetitive tasks, regression testing, and performance testing, ensuring faster and more reliable results. It significantly reduces the testing time for large-scale applications, allowing for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) practices.
Automation testing tools like Selenium, JUnit, and TestNG have become industry standards. The integration of AI and machine learning into automation testing is enhancing its capabilities, making it possible to predict potential failures and optimize test coverage.
In conclusion, while manual testing remains indispensable for certain scenarios, automation testing is increasingly becoming crucial in modern software development. A balanced approach, leveraging the strengths of both manual and automation testing, is the key to delivering high-quality software efficiently. Professionals skilled in both areas are in high demand, ensuring a robust career path in the testing domain.
See less