Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” (1925-1926) is one of the most horrifying statements of his anti-Semitic thought and the policies most inspired by that which the Nazi regime would carry out. Prejudice system is the main concept around which this book is based and is employed by Hitler as the basis of hiRead more
Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” (1925-1926) is one of the most horrifying statements of his anti-Semitic thought and the policies most inspired by that which the Nazi regime would carry out. Prejudice system is the main concept around which this book is based and is employed by Hitler as the basis of his superior race theories, hatred for Jews, and territorial expansionism.
Specified Racial Thoughts in “Mein Kampfff”
1. Racism and Aryan Supremacy
That true he presents a clear racial structure known to contemporary world, placing dominion of all races in the Aryans, mainly Germans as the “master race”. He defines them as being superior culturally and ethnically and biologically as well as being preordained to govern.
From this concept of the pure race he derives his call for eugenics, a strict segregation of the Aryan race, as well as the extermination of those he considers to be sub-human.
2. Antisemitism
The war against the Jews occupies a great portion of the book, this is the main topic of “Mein Kampf”. To Hitler, Jews are the worst form of racial enemies since they are accused of all the political, economic and the cultural crises in Germany.
As most scholars of early 20th century would agree, he propounds the idea that Jews are conspiring to poison the Aryan race, and taking over the world. These groundless conspiracy theories are ideology of the Holos-code itself.
3. Social Darwinism
– Hitler distorts Social Darwinism further arguing that race struggle is characteristic of the history of humanity. He regards this as a reason for war and the annexation of foreign territories and the enslavement, or outright elimination, of supposedly ‘inferior’ races.
He also painted Slavs, Roma and others as enemies who would cease Germany’s progress.
4. Increase of People (Bevölkerungsanstieg)
He ties racism to his idea of ‘Lebensraum’ an ideology that supports the invasion of the East with the aim of providing the Aryan German with land. In this regard, he seeks to replace or wipe out the so-called inferior races of people, the indigenous people.
Power of Racism within “Mein Kampf”
The racist notions contained within “Mein Kampf” were immediately reflected in the policies of the National Socialists under Hitler’s regime. These resulted in organized oppression and slaughter of millions of Jews, Roma, disabled people, and several other marginalized communities in the course of the Holocaust. In addition, the aggressive expansionism fueled by the degree of book ideology was responsible for triggering the outbreaks of World War II, and hence, it spread much suffering across the globe.
The understanding of 'home' in Partition stories is as near to religiosity and ideological affinity, based on emotions and cultural associations which human beings have with their region, community and identity-sponsor as the physical house. Most people forgot their old social and cultural bondage tRead more
The understanding of ‘home’ in Partition stories is as near to religiosity and ideological affinity, based on emotions and cultural associations which human beings have with their region, community and identity-sponsor as the physical house. Most people forgot their old social and cultural bondage that day when the 1947 India Partition took place, and millions were compelled to leave their homes. Partition literature unfolds the kind of loss by showing how ‘home’, what was once a heaven, turns out to be a space of division, alienation and in many cases remembrance.
Themes in the Concept of “Home” in Partition Literature
Loss and Displacement
There is paradigmatic dramatization of how dislocation affects people by presenting a paradigmatic example of how they are stripped off all that is familiar. The authors describe, indeed rather pain-fully, how the house becomes a place inhabited by strangers…a home becomes a source of suffering. So, the old notion of home as a stable, steady, and secure location to which one returns at the end of the day shifts and changes with the uns secure and perpetually on the move.
Memory and Nostalgia
For many Partition witnesses, the home was left behind – and it is a place of memory and desire. Most of the literature under discussion idealizes the life that was leading pre partition and searching for the lost homeland. Shmo aims at the construct of a physical house that everyone can go back to, which however is merely an imprint in the writers’ head.
Identity and Belonging
Home’ as Opiah maintains is often tied with identity in Partition literature. Famine, war and the demands of new homes that have to be built affects characters’ identity in the works. Many authors talk about how, in the line after Partition, individuals try to shear new existence and how memories of the original home serve both as a source of solace, a refuge and a constant reminder of a fractured entity.
Division and Alienation
A family is being driven apart; one community is being split away from another, an ideology of home is division; interreligious political discourses which are prevalent during this time narrate more about the ways in which shared homes and neighborhoods were being divided and people regarded the other as stranger. It brings about some sense of dislocation not only by the physical home but from the neighbors, friends, and loved ones left behind as well.
Survival and Resilience
However, the comprehension of Partition literature also encompasses tales of human potential in endurance. The description of fire and the broken walls and homes and the ability to construct something anew helps to comprehend the character of people’s instinct for survival. Although the meaning of ‘home’ is changing and getting rebuilt, the passion for new grounds is a testament for surviving.
Examples of some partition literature include:
Hopes for the survival of Train to Pakistan by Khushwant Singh, Amrita Pritam’s Pinjar and Bhisham Sahni’s Tamas elaborate these features. These writers build an interface through different characters to express how people bear the separate loss of homes and selfhood, representing the residual pain and suffering trough the Partition.
Partition literature, therefore, employs a fairly conservative concept of ‘home’ as an emblem to comment on displacement, memory, self & survival at one of the worst acts of human history. Through these stories, the reader is afforded the opportunity to think upon the interrelation of home, self, and community and that ‘home’, like the self, is as much a condition as it is a house.
See less