Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Ethics case study
Model Answer Introduction The case revolves around Rakesh, the Joint Commissioner of the Transport Department, faced with a complex situation following the death of a bus driver during an altercation. This incident has led to a strike by the drivers’ union, demanding full compensation and employmentRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case revolves around Rakesh, the Joint Commissioner of the Transport Department, faced with a complex situation following the death of a bus driver during an altercation. This incident has led to a strike by the drivers’ union, demanding full compensation and employment for the deceased driver’s family. Rakesh must navigate the interests of various stakeholders, including the family, the union, and the department management.
Body
(a) Options Available to Rakesh
(b) Critical Examination of Each Option
(c) Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Rakesh
(d) Recommended Course of Action
Rakesh should initiate a dialogue with the union and the deceased driver’s family. By demonstrating empathy and transparency, he can explain financial limitations and explore reasonable compensation options. This approach fosters collaboration and may lead to a resolution that addresses the interests of all stakeholders while maintaining the integrity of the department.
Conclusion
Rakesh’s decision-making should focus on a comprehensive approach that includes engaging with all parties involved, reviewing existing policies, and exploring alternative support options. This balanced strategy can help address the ethical dilemmas and promote a constructive resolution to the ongoing strike.
See lessEthics Case Study
Model Answer Introduction The case of Ashok, an investigative journalist, highlights significant ethical challenges in the context of illegal stone mining and corruption involving officials and politicians. As Ashok navigates the pressure from his TV channel’s CMD to suppress his report, he faces crRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case of Ashok, an investigative journalist, highlights significant ethical challenges in the context of illegal stone mining and corruption involving officials and politicians. As Ashok navigates the pressure from his TV channel’s CMD to suppress his report, he faces crucial decisions that impact not only his career but also the broader societal implications of corruption.
Body
(a) Options Available to Ashok
(b) Evaluation of Each Option
(c) Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Ashok
(d) Most Appropriate Option for Ashok
The most appropriate option for Ashok is to publish the investigative story. This action aligns with journalistic principles, promotes transparency, and serves the public’s right to know. Despite the risks involved, it contributes to accountability and can lead to necessary change in combating corruption.
(e) Suggested Training for Police Officers in Affected Districts
Conclusion
Ashok should prioritize exposing the corruption, thereby fulfilling his role as a journalist committed to truth and justice. Additionally, police officers in districts plagued by illegal mining should receive thorough training to combat corruption and enforce environmental laws effectively.
See lessEthics case study
Model Answer Introduction The case involves a newly employed quality inspector facing pressure from top management to overlook glaring defects in a consignment of shoes previously rejected for export. This situation raises ethical concerns about quality, company reputation, and job security, forcingRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case involves a newly employed quality inspector facing pressure from top management to overlook glaring defects in a consignment of shoes previously rejected for export. This situation raises ethical concerns about quality, company reputation, and job security, forcing the inspector to navigate a complex decision-making process.
Body
(a) Options Available
(b) Evaluation of Each Option
(c) Recommended Option
The most appropriate option is to refuse to sign off on the consignment. This choice reflects a commitment to quality and professional ethics, prioritizing integrity over immediate job security.
(d) Ethical Dilemmas Faced
(e) Consequences of Overlooking Quality Observations
Conclusion
Decisions made in this context must prioritize ethical principles and the long-term interests of the company, emphasizing the importance of quality and integrity in business practices.
See lessEthics Case Study
Model Answer Introduction The case study of Ramesh, the Director of the Home Department in a bordering state, highlights significant ethical dilemmas arising from his discovery of illegal migrant infiltration. Pressured to withdraw his report by the Additional Home Secretary, Ramesh must navigate coRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case study of Ramesh, the Director of the Home Department in a bordering state, highlights significant ethical dilemmas arising from his discovery of illegal migrant infiltration. Pressured to withdraw his report by the Additional Home Secretary, Ramesh must navigate complex options that balance personal and professional responsibilities.
Body
(a) Options Available to Ramesh
(b) Recommended Option
Ramesh should maintain the report and refuse to withdraw it. This decision reflects his commitment to integrity, transparency, and accountability, which are essential in his role. Addressing illegal migration is crucial for the state’s security and the welfare of its citizens.
(c) Critical Evaluation of Each Option
(d) Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Ramesh
(e) Policy Measures to Combat Infiltration of Illegal Migrants
Conclusion
Implementing these comprehensive measures is essential to effectively combat the infiltration of illegal migrants and ensure the security of the state, while Ramesh must uphold ethical standards in his role as a civil servant.
See lessEthics Case Studies
Model Answer Introduction The case of Prabhat, Vice President of Marketing at Sterling Electric Ltd., presents a significant ethical dilemma. Faced with the offer from Subhash Verma to provide stolen bid documents, Prabhat must navigate complex ethical issues that could impact both his career and thRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case of Prabhat, Vice President of Marketing at Sterling Electric Ltd., presents a significant ethical dilemma. Faced with the offer from Subhash Verma to provide stolen bid documents, Prabhat must navigate complex ethical issues that could impact both his career and the integrity of his company.
Body
(a) Ethical Issues Involved in the Case
(b) Options Available to Prabhat
(c) Most Appropriate Course of Action
The most appropriate course of action for Prabhat is to reject the offer and report the incident. This decision reinforces his commitment to ethical principles, maintains the integrity of the bidding process, and protects his company from legal and reputational risks. Accepting the offer would not only implicate him in unethical practices but could also lead to severe consequences for both his career and the organization as a whole.
Conclusion
By choosing to uphold ethical standards and report the incident, Prabhat can foster a culture of integrity within his organization and protect its long-term interests.
See lessWisdom lies in knowing what to reckon with and what to overlook. An officer being engrossed with the periphery, ignoring the core issues before him, is not rare in the bureaucracy. Do you agree that such preoccupation of an administrator leads to travesty of justice to the cause of effective service delivery and good governance? Critically evaluate. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Model Answer Introduction Wisdom lies in discerning what to prioritize and what to overlook. In bureaucratic settings, the effectiveness of an officer’s focus on peripheral matters versus core issues can significantly influence outcomes. While attention to detail is essential, an excessive focus onRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Wisdom lies in discerning what to prioritize and what to overlook. In bureaucratic settings, the effectiveness of an officer’s focus on peripheral matters versus core issues can significantly influence outcomes. While attention to detail is essential, an excessive focus on minor issues at the expense of critical ones can hinder effective service delivery and good governance.
Body
In bureaucratic contexts, an officer’s fixation on peripheral matters often leads to detrimental outcomes. For instance, consider a government official preoccupied with the formatting of reports while neglecting fundamental resource shortages essential for project implementation. This misplaced focus can result in project failures, ultimately affecting service delivery (Source: OECD Report on Public Governance).
A pertinent example arises in public health scenarios. If a public health officer prioritizes regulatory compliance over addressing the underlying causes of a health crisis—such as inadequate sanitation or lack of healthcare access—the crisis continues unabated, illustrating a travesty of justice in governance (Source: World Health Organization).
Conversely, officers who effectively distinguish between peripheral and core issues can enhance decision-making. For example, a police officer who recognizes that a minor traffic violation is a symptom of a larger community conflict can address the root causes rather than merely enforcing the law superficially. This approach leads to more effective outcomes, demonstrating the importance of prioritizing core issues (Source: Community Policing Reports).
Conclusion
While attention to peripheral issues is necessary, it is crucial for bureaucratic officers to prioritize core issues. Ignoring these foundational concerns leads to a travesty of justice, hindering effective service delivery and good governance. A balanced focus enables better resource allocation and fosters outcomes that truly serve the public interest.
See lessIn contemporary world, corporate sector’s contribution in generating wealth and employment is increasing. In doing so, they are bringing in unprecedented onslaught on the climate, environmental sustainability and living conditions of human beings. In this background, do you find that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is efficient and sufficient enough to fulfill the social roles and responsibilities needed in the corporate world for which the CSR is mandated? Critically examine. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Model Answer Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to voluntary initiatives undertaken by corporations to incorporate social, environmental, and ethical concerns into their business practices. While CSR has gained traction in recent years, questions arise regarding its efficiencyRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to voluntary initiatives undertaken by corporations to incorporate social, environmental, and ethical concerns into their business practices. While CSR has gained traction in recent years, questions arise regarding its efficiency and sufficiency in fulfilling the social roles and responsibilities expected of corporations.
Significance of CSR Initiatives
On one hand, CSR initiatives have positively impacted society. For instance, many corporations have launched programs aimed at reducing their carbon footprint, enhancing education and skill development for underprivileged communities, and providing disaster relief. A notable example is Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan, which aims to halve the company’s environmental footprint while increasing its positive social impact (Source: Unilever Sustainability Report).
On the other hand, critics argue that CSR is inadequate in addressing the fundamental social and environmental challenges corporations face. Many CSR initiatives are voluntary and often driven by public relations rather than genuine concern for societal impact. For example, a 2020 study found that 75% of CSR activities were focused on marketing rather than making a substantial social impact (Source: Harvard Business Review).
Moreover, CSR can sometimes serve as a facade, allowing corporations to mask unethical practices such as labor rights violations, environmental degradation, and tax evasion. For instance, a report by Oxfam highlighted that some corporations engage in extensive CSR marketing while continuing to exploit workers and evade taxes (Source: Oxfam International).
To genuinely contribute to societal well-being, corporations must adopt a more comprehensive approach that integrates social responsibility into their core operations. This includes sustainable business practices, fair treatment of employees, and transparent governance.
Conclusion
While CSR initiatives play a role in corporate responsibility, they are insufficient for addressing the complex social and environmental challenges of today. A holistic approach that integrates ethical considerations into the core business strategy is essential for meaningful impact.
See lessRussia and Ukraine war has been going on for the last seven months. Different countries have taken independent stands and actions keeping in view their own national interests. We are all aware that war has its own impact on the different aspects of society, including human tragedy. What are those ethical issues that are crucial to be considered while launching the war and its continuation so far? Illustrate with justification the ethical issues involved in the given state of affair. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Model Answer Introduction The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has raised significant ethical concerns as it enters its seventh month. The war has resulted in a devastating humanitarian crisis, prompting various countries to take independent stances based on their national interests. It iRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has raised significant ethical concerns as it enters its seventh month. The war has resulted in a devastating humanitarian crisis, prompting various countries to take independent stances based on their national interests. It is essential to explore the ethical issues associated with both the launch and continuation of this war.
Ethical Issues Involved in the Russia-Ukraine War
Conclusion
The Russia-Ukraine conflict exemplifies numerous ethical issues related to the use of force, human rights violations, and humanitarian crises. Addressing these ethical concerns is crucial for all parties involved to work towards a peaceful resolution that respects human rights and safeguards civilian lives.
See lessWhat do you understand by the term ‘good governance? How far recent initiatives in terms of e-Governance steps taken by the State have helped the beneficiaries? Discuss with suitable examples. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Model Answer Introduction Good governance refers to the effective and efficient management of public resources, institutions, and services to ensure that they are transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs of the citizens. It involves a combination of sound policies, efficient public admiRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Good governance refers to the effective and efficient management of public resources, institutions, and services to ensure that they are transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs of the citizens. It involves a combination of sound policies, efficient public administration, and active participation of citizens in decision-making processes.
Good Governance
Recent initiatives in terms of e-Governance steps taken by the State have greatly helped the beneficiaries:
Conclusion
E-Governance initiatives have significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of government services, increased transparency, reduced corruption, and enhanced citizen participation in decision-making processes. However, there is still much room for improvement, and it is essential for the government to continue investing in and expanding e-Governance initiatives to further enhance public services and promote good governance.
See lessThe Rules and Regulations provided to all the civil servants are same, yet there is difference in the performance. Positive minded officers are able to interpret the Rules and Regulations in favour of the case and achieve success, whereas negative minded officers are unable to achieve goals by interpreting the same Rules and Regulations against the case. Discuss with illustrations. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Model Answer Introduction All civil servants operate under the same set of rules and regulations. However, the differences in their performance often stem from their mindset and approach to interpreting these guidelines. Officers with a positive outlook tend to achieve better outcomes than their negRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
All civil servants operate under the same set of rules and regulations. However, the differences in their performance often stem from their mindset and approach to interpreting these guidelines. Officers with a positive outlook tend to achieve better outcomes than their negative-minded counterparts.
Body
Positive-Minded Officers
Positive-minded officers interpret rules as flexible guidelines that can be adapted to serve the community effectively. They leverage their discretion to achieve meaningful results, even in challenging situations.
Example: A social welfare officer might encounter a family in urgent need of assistance. While the regulations may not explicitly allow for additional support, a positive-minded officer could interpret the rules creatively to provide necessary aid, ultimately improving the family’s situation and fostering goodwill in the community. This approach not only helps those in need but also enhances the officer’s reputation and the public’s trust in the institution.
Negative-Minded Officers
In contrast, negative-minded officers often view rules as rigid constraints that limit their ability to act. This mindset can lead to missed opportunities for positive impact and can hinder performance.
Example: An officer in public safety may strictly adhere to regulations that discourage community engagement. By interpreting the rules as barriers to interaction, this officer may fail to build essential relationships with community members. Consequently, this lack of engagement can result in misunderstandings, reduced trust, and ineffective policing, ultimately harming community safety and the officer’s effectiveness.
Conclusion
Encouraging a positive mindset among civil servants is crucial for enhancing their performance. By fostering an environment where officers feel empowered to interpret rules flexibly and in the best interest of the community, we can ensure that they achieve positive outcomes and make a significant impact in the lives of those they serve. This approach not only benefits the community but also promotes a culture of trust and collaboration within public service.
See less