Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Ethics Case Study
Model Answer Introduction The case presents a moral and ethical challenge faced by a senior officer in the Ministry tasked with overseeing a mega road construction project. The Minister’s request to realign the road for personal gain raises severe ethical concerns, particularly regarding the potentiRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case presents a moral and ethical challenge faced by a senior officer in the Ministry tasked with overseeing a mega road construction project. The Minister’s request to realign the road for personal gain raises severe ethical concerns, particularly regarding the potential harm to the public interest and environmental sustainability.
Body
a. Immediate Actions
Faced with the situation, the first step is to refuse the Minister’s request. Aligning the road closer to the Minister’s farmhouse would lead to significant negative consequences, including:
b. Conflicts of Interest
c .Responsibilities as a Public Servant
Conclusion
In this scenario, refusing the Minister’s unethical request and prioritizing public interest is paramount. Upholding ethical standards is crucial in a senior officer’s role, ensuring that decisions benefit society rather than individual agendas. If necessary, further support from higher authorities should be sought to maintain integrity in public service.
See lessEthics Case Study
Model Answer Introduction In this case study, Rakesh, a responsible district-level officer, is tasked with identifying beneficiaries for a healthcare scheme aimed at senior citizens. The scheme has specific eligibility criteria, including age, community status, family income, and potential health ouRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
In this case study, Rakesh, a responsible district-level officer, is tasked with identifying beneficiaries for a healthcare scheme aimed at senior citizens. The scheme has specific eligibility criteria, including age, community status, family income, and potential health outcomes. Although the elderly couple seeking assistance meets all criteria except for belonging to a reserved community, Rakesh must approach the situation with empathy, considering their dire financial situation and the significant positive impact the treatment would have on their quality of life.
Body
To address the couple’s situation, Rakesh can take the following steps:
Conclusion
By approaching the situation with compassion and a commitment to exploring all possible avenues of assistance, Rakesh can make a well-informed decision that prioritizes the elderly couple’s well-being while adhering to the scheme’s established criteria as closely as possible.
See lessWith regard to morality of actions, one view is that means are of paramount importance and the other view is that the ends justify the means. Which view do you think is more appropriate ? Justify your answer. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction The debate over whether the means or the ends are more critical in assessing the morality of actions is complex, with compelling arguments on both sides. Each perspective brings valuable insights into moral philosophy and ethical decision-making. Body On one hand, the viewRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The debate over whether the means or the ends are more critical in assessing the morality of actions is complex, with compelling arguments on both sides. Each perspective brings valuable insights into moral philosophy and ethical decision-making.
Body
On one hand, the view that means are of paramount importance argues that the morality of an action hinges on the methods employed to achieve it. This perspective emphasizes ethical standards, asserting that unethical means cannot justify a desirable outcome. For instance, the principle of non-violence in Mahatma Gandhi’s Indian independence movement underscores this view, where the means of non-violent civil disobedience were as significant as the end goal of independence. This approach ensures that the outcome aligns with moral values, fostering a just society.
Conversely, the belief that the ends justify the means posits that the ultimate goal is the primary consideration, permitting any means necessary to achieve it, regardless of ethical implications. This view can be seen in extreme situations, such as a government imposing martial law to prevent a terrorist attack that could cause mass casualties. Here, the dire need to protect lives may justify questionable actions.
In my opinion, neither view is universally appropriate. Context and circumstances significantly influence the evaluation of morality. While there are scenarios where undesirable means may be justified for critical outcomes, in most cases, the ethical integrity of the means employed is essential to ensure the outcome is not only desirable but also morally acceptable.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a balanced approach that considers both the means and the ends, alongside the ethical principles involved, is the most appropriate way to evaluate the morality of actions. Recognizing the interplay between means and ends allows for more nuanced moral reasoning, fostering both ethical integrity and beneficial outcomes.
See less"In doing a good thing, everything is permitted which is not prohibited expressly or by clear implication." Examine the statement with suitable examples in the context of a public servant discharging his/her duties. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction The statement suggests that when public servants engage in actions deemed beneficial, they may take liberties as long as such actions are not explicitly prohibited by law. However, this raises critical questions about the definition of a "good thing" and the ethical implicaRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The statement suggests that when public servants engage in actions deemed beneficial, they may take liberties as long as such actions are not explicitly prohibited by law. However, this raises critical questions about the definition of a “good thing” and the ethical implications of actions that may not be legally restricted.
Body
Upholding the Law
Public servants are entrusted with the responsibility of enforcing laws fairly and ethically. They cannot justify unethical behavior by claiming to pursue good outcomes.
Example: The extrajudicial killing of Sohrabuddin Sheikh involved police officers who acted unlawfully under the guise of maintaining public order. Their actions, justified as serving the greater good, resulted in severe legal and ethical repercussions.
Corruption and Bribery
Public servants must act in the public’s interest, free from corruption. Acceptance of bribes is never justified, regardless of the claimed intentions behind the actions.
Example: In 2012, IRS officer Ashok Kumar Singh was arrested for accepting a bribe of ₹2 lakh to manipulate a tax assessment. His actions, aimed to benefit certain individuals, ultimately undermined public trust.
Misuse of Power
Power should be exercised within legal boundaries. Misusing authority for personal gain, even if perceived as beneficial, erodes public trust.
Example: The Adarsh Housing Society scam involved politicians and bureaucrats who exploited their positions to secure apartments meant for war veterans, undermining ethical governance.
Conflict of Interest
Public servants should avoid personal interests conflicting with their duties.
Example: Former Minister Shashi Tharoor faced scrutiny for alleged conflicts of interest during the IPL controversy, where his involvement in a bidding company raised ethical concerns while he served in a governmental role.
Conclusion
These examples illustrate that public servants must prioritize integrity, transparency, and accountability over perceived good intentions. Upholding ethical standards and the law is essential for fostering trust and promoting good governance in society.
See lessSuppose the Govt. of India is thinking of constructing a dam in a mountain valley bound by forests & inhabited by ethnic communities. What rational policy should it resort to in dealing with unforeseen contingencies? (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction If the Government of India is planning to construct a dam in a mountain valley bound by forests and inhabited by ethnic communities, it should adopt a rational policy that prioritizes the interests of all stakeholders and addresses any unforeseen contingencies that may arisRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
If the Government of India is planning to construct a dam in a mountain valley bound by forests and inhabited by ethnic communities, it should adopt a rational policy that prioritizes the interests of all stakeholders and addresses any unforeseen contingencies that may arise.
Body
To effectively manage the complexities associated with such a project, the government could consider the following rational policies:
Conclusion
In conclusion, any development project, particularly one involving a dam in a sensitive ecological and cultural area, must be designed and implemented with the interests of all stakeholders in mind. By adopting a rational policy that emphasizes stakeholder participation and environmental sustainability, the government can ensure that the project is beneficial and socially responsible.
See lessExplain the process of resolving ethical dilemmas in Public Administration. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction Public administration often faces complex ethical dilemmas arising from the intersection of power, accountability, and public interest. Effectively resolving these dilemmas requires a systematic approach that balances competing values and interests. Body Examples of EthicalRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Public administration often faces complex ethical dilemmas arising from the intersection of power, accountability, and public interest. Effectively resolving these dilemmas requires a systematic approach that balances competing values and interests.
Body
Examples of Ethical Dilemmas
Process of Resolving Ethical Dilemmas
Conclusion
By following this structured process, public servants can make decisions that serve the public good while upholding ethical standards. A transparent and accountable approach is essential for fostering trust and promoting ethical behavior in public administration. This reinforces the integrity of the public sector and enhances its service to the community.
See lessWhat is meant by conflict of interest? Illustrate with examples, the difference between the actual and potential conflicts of interest. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction Conflict of interest refers to a situation where an individual's personal or financial interests may compromise their ability to make unbiased decisions in their professional role. Recognizing and managing such conflicts is crucial for maintaining integrity in various profeRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Conflict of interest refers to a situation where an individual’s personal or financial interests may compromise their ability to make unbiased decisions in their professional role. Recognizing and managing such conflicts is crucial for maintaining integrity in various professions.
Body
Actual Conflict of Interest
An actual conflict of interest occurs when a person’s personal interests directly clash with their professional responsibilities. Here are some examples:
Potential Conflict of Interest
A potential conflict of interest arises when personal interests could influence professional duties, even if they currently do not. Examples include:
Conclusion
In both actual and potential conflict scenarios, personal interests can significantly impact professional responsibilities. It is essential for individuals to recognize these conflicts and take appropriate steps, such as disclosing them or recusing themselves, to uphold ethical standards in their professions. Awareness and transparency are key to managing conflicts of interest effectively.
See less"The true rule, in determining to embrace, or reject any thing, is not whether it has any evil in it; but whether it has more evil than good. There are few things wholly evil or wholly good. Almost every thing, especially of governmental policy, is an inseparable compound of the two; so that our best judgment of the preponderance between them is continually demanded."-Abraham Lincoln (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction Abraham Lincoln’s quote underscores the complexity of decision-making, particularly within government policy. He suggests that few things are entirely good or evil; instead, most are a blend of both. This perspective compels us to assess the balance of benefits and harms inRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Abraham Lincoln’s quote underscores the complexity of decision-making, particularly within government policy. He suggests that few things are entirely good or evil; instead, most are a blend of both. This perspective compels us to assess the balance of benefits and harms involved in any action.
Body
In today’s public administration, Lincoln’s insights are highly relevant. Policy decisions often have wide-ranging effects on diverse stakeholders, making it the responsibility of public servants to carefully evaluate the positive and negative aspects of each option.
Infrastructure Policy
For instance, consider a new infrastructure project, such as a dam. The government must weigh the benefits of generating clean energy against potential environmental damage and the impact on local communities’ livelihoods. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is essential to determine whether the project’s advantages outweigh its drawbacks.
Healthcare Policy
In the realm of healthcare, when crafting policies, governments must balance the advantages of providing affordable healthcare for all against the financial implications, such as the need for increased taxes. While universal healthcare could enhance public health, the economic burden on taxpayers is a significant consideration.
Environmental Policy
Similarly, when formulating environmental policies, the government must evaluate the benefits of conserving natural resources against the costs involved. For example, policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions might positively impact the environment, but they could also lead to higher energy costs, affecting both businesses and households.
Foreign Policy
In foreign relations, governments face the challenge of promoting democracy and human rights while considering the potential costs, such as economic sanctions or military intervention. Sanctions might advance democratic goals but can also lead to economic hardship for the affected nation’s citizens.
Conclusion
Lincoln’s quote serves as a reminder of the necessity for thoughtful decision-making that considers the potential costs and benefits of actions. By evaluating the preponderance of good versus evil, governments can make informed choices that prioritize the public interest and foster overall well-being.
See lessWhat is meant by public interest ? What are the principles and procedures to be followed by the civil servants in public interest? (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction Public interest refers to the common good or welfare of the general public, emphasizing the needs of the broader community over individual or specific group interests. In the context of civil service, it signifies the obligation of civil servants to prioritize the public'sRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Public interest refers to the common good or welfare of the general public, emphasizing the needs of the broader community over individual or specific group interests. In the context of civil service, it signifies the obligation of civil servants to prioritize the public’s best interests, avoiding personal gains or favoritism.
Body
Principles to be Followed by Civil Servants
Civil servants must ensure that their actions are open to public scrutiny. They should provide accurate and timely information and be prepared to justify their decisions.
Civil servants should make decisions based on facts and evidence rather than personal biases. This objectivity is crucial for fair governance.
Actions taken by civil servants should be efficient and effective, utilizing public resources wisely to achieve desired outcomes.
Civil servants are mandated to respect and protect the rights and dignity of all individuals, fostering an inclusive environment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, acting in the public interest is a fundamental principle for civil servants in India. By adhering to principles such as transparency, objectivity, efficiency, and respect for human rights, civil servants can ensure that their actions align with the best interests of the community they serve. These values are essential for fostering trust and accountability within public administration.
See lessState the three basic values, universal in nature, in the context of civil services and bring out their importance. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Model Answer Introduction In the context of civil services, three basic values are universally recognized: integrity, objectivity, and professionalism. These values are essential for maintaining the ethical standards expected of public servants and ensuring effective governance. Body 1. Integrity InRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
In the context of civil services, three basic values are universally recognized: integrity, objectivity, and professionalism. These values are essential for maintaining the ethical standards expected of public servants and ensuring effective governance.
Body
1. Integrity
Integrity involves adherence to moral and ethical principles, encompassing honesty, transparency, and accountability in decision-making. Civil servants must act impartially and be accountable for their actions. For instance, IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal, while serving in Gautam Buddha Nagar, confronted the sand mafia and faced suspension for her bold actions. Despite this, she received public support and was reinstated, demonstrating that integrity is crucial for standing against corruption.
2. Objectivity
Objectivity entails making decisions based on factual evidence rather than personal biases. This value is vital for fairness in public service. A notable example is the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) launched in 2015, which aimed at financial inclusion for all citizens. The scheme’s implementation, characterized by its unbiased approach, led to the opening of over 42 crore bank accounts, showcasing the successful application of objectivity in civil services.
3. Professionalism
Professionalism refers to the competence and efficiency that civil servants bring to their roles. It involves high standards of work and responsiveness to citizen needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, IAS officer Dr. K. Senthil Raj exemplified professionalism by effectively managing the crisis in Krishnagiri district through quarantine measures and testing protocols. His exemplary service earned him the Prime Minister’s Excellence Award, highlighting the importance of professionalism in civil service.
Conclusion
Upholding integrity, objectivity, and professionalism promotes good governance, social justice, and economic growth. It is essential for civil servants to embody these values in their work, ensuring they serve the public effectively and ethically.
See less