Existentialism in Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot” is central to the play’s themes and characters. The play revolves around two main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, who wait endlessly for someone named Godot. This waiting, filled with uncertainty and seemingly pointless routines, reflects the existentialist view of life as inherently meaningless.

Beckett explores existentialism by highlighting the absurdity of human existence. Vladimir and Estragon’s repetitive actions and conversations illustrate the futility of seeking purpose in an indifferent universe. The absence of a clear plot or resolution reinforces the idea that life lacks inherent meaning and structure.

The characters’ interactions emphasize existentialist themes of alienation and despair. They struggle with memory and identity, often questioning their own existence and the reality around them. This reflects existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre’s idea that individuals are responsible for creating their own essence through actions, yet Vladimir and Estragon find themselves unable to take decisive action.

The figure of Godot, who never arrives, symbolizes the elusive search for meaning or salvation. This aligns with the existentialist belief that waiting for an external force to give life meaning is futile. Instead, Beckett suggests that individuals must confront the absurdity of existence and find their own way to cope with it, even if that means accepting its inherent meaninglessness.

In summary, “Waiting for Godot” embodies existentialist principles by portraying a world where life is inherently meaningless, and individuals must navigate the absurdity and uncertainty of existence on their own.