Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Arguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessArguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessArguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessArguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessArguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessArguments say that India copied its Constitution from other countries rather than making its own. Answer this in 200 words with relevant points.
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, butRead more
The comment that India imitated or borrowed its Constitution from other countries lacks the insight to identify the thoughtfulness and meticulousness that went into the drafting of that Constitution. The Indian Constitution does have selective salient features borrowed from other constitutions, but that was done with great pondering and contemplation, as these features could be further adapted easily into the Indian social and political milieu and domain.
1. Varied Sources of Inspiration: The Indian Constitution has been influenced by several sources including the British, American, Irish, Canadian, Australian, etc. For example, the concept of Fundamental Rights has obtained directly and indirectly from the U.S. Bill of Rights whereas the parliamentary system of government is a carbon copy of that of Britain.
2. Tailored to Indian Needs: Those borrowed features were not merely the copy words; rather, those were to be altered in the light of Indian needs. The makers of the Constitution under the Chairmanship of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar very cautiously deliberated and then made amendments in them to be relevant to India’s peculiar problems and aspirations.
3. Comprehensive and Original Framework: It is a broad document and contains the uniquity in the sense that, under the Constitution, provision for social justice, federalism, and the detailed Fundamental Duties list is relatively unique to India and nowhere else.
4. Innovative Provisions: It includes innovative provisions such as the Directive Principles of State Policy, which provide guidelines for the government to lay down the laws regarding the social and economic welfare of the people.
However, the Indian Constitution ventured only to draw from the earlier precedents. It was an original document, carved dethe only way possible to deal with the multiple and complicated needs of the country.
See lessJudiciary
The improvement of the judicial system of India is indeed a difficult task, but very important. Some ways through which it could be improved are as follows: 1. Increase the Number of Judges: Because of the low judge-to-population ratio, the courts are getting bogged down. Increasing the number of juRead more
The improvement of the judicial system of India is indeed a difficult task, but very important. Some ways through which it could be improved are as follows:
1. Increase the Number of Judges: Because of the low judge-to-population ratio, the courts are getting bogged down. Increasing the number of judges and court staff will help reduce the case burden.
2. Judicial Reforms: Judicial reforms, like simplification of procedures and reduction of procedural delays, can smoothen the process. This would include revising old, antiquated laws and taking measures to see that the procedures are efficient.
3. Integrate with Technology: There can be better efficiency if technology is adopted in a big way. This includes putting case records in digital form and the electronic filing system, and, at times, even videoconferencing for hearings.
4. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Encourage the adoption of ADR mechanisms like mediation and arbitration for the quick settlement of disputes and therefore reducing the burden on courts.
5. Fast-Track Courts: Setting up fast-track courts for a specified category of cases, either criminal cases or commercial disputes, will help the judiciary to work faster.
6. Training and Capacity Building: Continuous training imparted to judges and court staff will upgrade their skill and knowledge so that the quality and pace of judicial proceedings improve.
7. Legal Aid and Awareness: Facilitating access to legal aid for the weaker segments of society and launching awareness campaigns about rights under the law will enable more and more people to use the legal system effectively.
8. Case Management Systems: Effective case management systems can be put in place for tracking and management of cases to ensure the progress of cases is timely and there are no undue delays.
9. Regular Monitoring and Evaluation: Mechanisms for regular monitoring and evaluation of court performance need to be instituted so that inefficiencies are detected and rectified.
10. Public Engagement and Feedback: Engaging the public and eliciting their response to the judicial system could go a long way in bringing about desired improvements.
Attention to the revealed deficiencies in these areas can make the judiciary system in India more efficient and effective.
See lessIndian Constitution
The two—the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy—under the Indian Constitution, are related to each other inseparably to fulfill the broader goals of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. Fundamental Rights Nature: Justiciable, that is, legally enforceable in courts. PurRead more
The two—the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy—under the Indian Constitution, are related to each other inseparably to fulfill the broader goals of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.
Fundamental Rights
Nature: Justiciable, that is, legally enforceable in courts.
Purpose: Protect individual freedoms and rights against state actions, ensuring personal liberties and equality.
Examples: Right to equality, right to freedom of speech and expression, right to life and personal liberty, right against exploitation, right to freedom of religion.
Directive Principles of State Policy
These are non-justiciable in nature. That is to say, these cannot be legally implemented or challenged in a court of law.
These guidelines provide directions to the state for formulating and implementing policies toward establishing social and economic democracy.
Examples: Adequate means of livelihood, equal distribution of wealth, right to work, education and public assistance, promotion of the health and welfare of people.
Relationship
1.Complementarity: Fundamental Rights ensure political democracy by protecting individual rights, and DPSPs aim at establishing social and economic democracy by guiding state policies.
2. Integration: Both are essential for realizing the constitutional vision. Fundamental Rights present the framework within which the state has to operate, while DPSPs give a roadmap for the state to create conditions where Fundamental Rights can be meaningfully exercised.
3. Judicial Interpretation : Courts interpret FRs, more often than not, by reflecting on DPSPs so that, in effect, individual freedom and social justice meet at an appropriate juncture. For instance, the right to education was interpreted by borrowing from the DPSP relating to free and compulsory education for children.
4. Policy Making: DPSPs have an impact on laws and policies. They cannot take precedence over Fundamental Rights, but they do act as an inspiration to legislation and administrative actions in executing social and economic objectives.
In effect, the fundamental rights and the DPSPs form the very bedrock of a democratic society that strives to strike a balance between individual liberties and collective well-being.
See lessWhy didn’t Dr. Ambedkar include the word “secularism” in the constitution?
Though Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was the principal architect of the Constitution, he never used the term "secularism" in the original document. The reason behind this was that he believed its essence was already instilled in the working of the Constitution through various provisions that ensured freedom ofRead more
Though Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was the principal architect of the Constitution, he never used the term “secularism” in the original document. The reason behind this was that he believed its essence was already instilled in the working of the Constitution through various provisions that ensured freedom of religion and equal treatment of religions. Articles from 25 to 28 ensured freedom of religion, and the Preamble laid emphasis on justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity, which implicitly acknowledged the concept of a secular state.
The term “secularism” was inserted into the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment under Indira Gandhi’s prime ministership in 1976. This was a broader attempt at underlining the country’s commitment to secularism and socialism at a time when the polity was getting increasingly satiated with political and social disturbances. It was reiterated in the Preamble itself, reiterating the fact that India shall remain committed to the cause of religious neutrality by treating all religions equally so that the State does not show any partiality towards any particular religion.
See lessWhy didn’t Dr. Ambedkar include the word “secularism” in the constitution?
Though Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was the principal architect of the Constitution, he never used the term "secularism" in the original document. The reason behind this was that he believed its essence was already instilled in the working of the Constitution through various provisions that ensured freedom ofRead more
Though Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was the principal architect of the Constitution, he never used the term “secularism” in the original document. The reason behind this was that he believed its essence was already instilled in the working of the Constitution through various provisions that ensured freedom of religion and equal treatment of religions. Articles from 25 to 28 ensured freedom of religion, and the Preamble laid emphasis on justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity, which implicitly acknowledged the concept of a secular state.
The term “secularism” was inserted into the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment under Indira Gandhi’s prime ministership in 1976. This was a broader attempt at underlining the country’s commitment to secularism and socialism at a time when the polity was getting increasingly satiated with political and social disturbances. It was reiterated in the Preamble itself, reiterating the fact that India shall remain committed to the cause of religious neutrality by treating all religions equally so that the State does not show any partiality towards any particular religion.
See less