The American Continental Army and British forces employed distinct tactics and strategies during the American Revolutionary War: American Continental Army: 1. Guerrilla warfare: Hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, and sabotage. 2. Mobility: Rapid troop movements and surprise attacks. 3. Adaptability: AdjRead more
The American Continental Army and British forces employed distinct tactics and strategies during the American Revolutionary War:
American Continental Army:
1. Guerrilla warfare: Hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, and sabotage.
2. Mobility: Rapid troop movements and surprise attacks.
3. Adaptability: Adjusting to terrain and circumstances.
4. Militia support: Leveraging local knowledge and resources.
5. Fabian strategy: Wearing down the enemy through prolonged warfare.
British Forces:
1. Conventional warfare: Traditional European linear battles.
2. Discipline and order: Emphasis on formation and drill.
3. Superior firepower: Reliance on artillery and musketry.
4. Control of territory: Occupying key locations and supply lines.
Key factors in American success:
1. Geographical advantage: Familiar terrain and long supply lines for British forces.
2. Popular support: Local militia and civilian aid.
3. Leadership: George Washington’s strategic vision and adaptability.
4. French alliance: Financial and military support.
5. British strategic mistakes: Underestimating American determination and overextending resources.
The Americans’ unconventional tactics, mobility, and adaptability ultimately exhausted the British, securing victory in the war.
See less
One of the significant issues that has been realized in a disaster is a failure in coordination between various stakeholders. It cuts across inter-agency collaboration, sub-national actors, NGOs, private entities, and parishes. If there is role confusion and responsibilities or if the response is unRead more
One of the significant issues that has been realized in a disaster is a failure in coordination between various stakeholders. It cuts across inter-agency collaboration, sub-national actors, NGOs, private entities, and parishes. If there is role confusion and responsibilities or if the response is uncoordinated during the mitigation, response, recovery or disposition phase, then resources are late in arriving or are committed to the wrong thing in that critical period affecting both short-term operations and final outcome.
And if this is not well coordinated then other key activities such as early warning systems, resources mobilization, public communication etc. can also go wrong. Capacity also leads to gaps in training and preparedness and risk assessment in the establishment of disaster resistance. This calls for a credible framework of disaster management that promotes synergy, and information exchange among all stakeholders.
See less