It will have a multi-faceted approach to safeguarding a constitution against amendments that may undermine the basic rights. Some of the key strategies include: Constitutional Safeguards Rigid Constitution: The rigidity of a constitution can be enhanced by making amendments in the constitution by spRead more
It will have a multi-faceted approach to safeguarding a constitution against amendments that may undermine the basic rights. Some of the key strategies include:
Constitutional Safeguards
Rigid Constitution: The rigidity of a constitution can be enhanced by making amendments in the constitution by special majority or through a referendum. This makes it difficult to change fundamental rights.
Judicial Review: A strong and independent judiciary can review the constitutionality of laws and amendments, thus not violating the fundamental rights.
-Fundamental Rights: The constitution can be difficult to amend in a way that erodes fundamental rights if they are clearly defined and protected.
Public Awareness and Participation:
-Civic Education: Educating the public about the importance of fundamental rights and the role of the constitution in protecting them.
-Active Citizenry: Encouraging citizens to participate in public discourse and hold governments accountable for upholding constitutional values.
-Civil Society Organizations: Supporting civil society organizations that monitor government actions and advocate for human rights.
Institutional Mechanisms:
Independent Commissions: Setting up independent commissions to oversee the implementation of fundamental rights and investigate violations.
Parliamentary Committees: Strengthening parliamentary committees to scrutinize legislation and government policies that may affect fundamental rights.
Media Freedom: Protecting media freedom to ensure independent reporting and public scrutiny.
Combining these strategies can, therefore, be effective in protecting a constitution as well as taking care of fundamental rights from degradation to build a just and fair society.
See less
Media and public scrutiny are instrumental in holding the government accountable for lapses in addressing women’s safety issues through a multi-faceted approach. By raising awareness, the media ensures that incidents of violence and systemic issues affecting women's safety are brought to the forefroRead more
Media and public scrutiny are instrumental in holding the government accountable for lapses in addressing women’s safety issues through a multi-faceted approach. By raising awareness, the media ensures that incidents of violence and systemic issues affecting women’s safety are brought to the forefront of public discourse. This constant visibility prevents these issues from being ignored and compels policymakers to take action. Investigative journalism plays a crucial role by uncovering systemic failures, corruption, or negligence within government bodies responsible for women’s safety. These revelations often spark public outcry, increasing pressure on government officials to respond and implement changes. Public scrutiny, amplified through media platforms, mobilizes citizens to demand accountability and reform, creating a groundswell of public opinion that can influence political agendas. Additionally, media platforms provide a voice for victims, activists, and experts, ensuring that diverse perspectives are heard and considered in policy discussions. By highlighting policy shortcomings and advocating for improvements, the media fosters an informed and engaged citizenry. Continuous coverage and follow-up reporting maintain pressure on the government to act, ensuring that women’s safety remains a priority. Furthermore, the media can track the progress of implemented measures, holding officials accountable for their promises and actions. In this way, media and public scrutiny serve as vital checks on government power, driving transparency, accountability, and ultimately, positive change in policies and practices related to women’s safety.
See less