Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Critically examine the relevance of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act in evolving the reservations policy as tool to meet the objectives of social justice in India.
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2019, introduced a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) in education and public employment, marking a significant shift in India's reservation policy. Earlier, reservations were aimed at addressing historical injustices and socialRead more
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2019, introduced a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) in education and public employment, marking a significant shift in India’s reservation policy. Earlier, reservations were aimed at addressing historical injustices and social disadvantages faced by Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC). This amendment extends benefits based on economic criteria, regardless of caste. Its relevance lies in acknowledging economic hardship as a barrier to social mobility, broadening the scope of social justice. The Supporters argue that it addresses the needs of economically disadvantaged groups who do not fall under existing reserved categories, promoting inclusive growth. Critics says that this economic-based reservation may dilute the original intention of reservations, which is to rectify systemic social discrimination. Additionally, the 10% EWS quota raises questions about the practical implementation and potential overlap with existing quotas, which already account for 50% of seats. The amendment also risks perpetuating the reliance on quotas as a solution, rather than addressing structural inequalities through comprehensive socio-economic reforms. Thus,the 103rd Amendment aims to expand the ambit of social justice, its long-term impact on achieving genuine equity and inclusion remains to be critically evaluated.
See lessEconomic Growth vs. Environmental Protection in Developing Countries
The debate between economic growth and environmental protection in developing countries is complex and essential . On one hand, economic growth is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and providing better infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Many developing nations relyRead more
The debate between economic growth and environmental protection in developing countries is complex and essential . On one hand, economic growth is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and providing better infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Many developing nations rely on industrialization, urbanization, and exploitation of natural resources to fuel this growth. This often comes at the cost of environmental degradation, including deforestation, air and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. On the other hand, environmental protection is crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability and the health of populations. Developing countries face the challenge of balancing these competing priorities. A focus only on economic growth can lead to severe environmental damage, which in turn can undermine future economic prospects by depleting natural resources and causing health problems. Likewise , stringent environmental regulations can hinder economic development by increasing costs and limiting industrial activities. So, the solution lies in adopting a sustainable development model that integrates economic growth with environmental stewardship. This includes investing in green technologies, enforcing environmental regulations, and promoting practices that minimize ecological footprints. International support, through financial aid and technology transfer, is also important to help developing countries achieve this balance.
See lessEconomic Growth vs. Environmental Protection in Developing Countries
Developing countries like India face the ultimate need to improve living standards and reduce poverty, making economic growth a priority. prioritizing growth at the expense of stringent environmental regulations can lead to long-term detrimental effects. Environmental degradation not only harms pubRead more
Developing countries like India face the ultimate need to improve living standards and reduce poverty, making economic growth a priority. prioritizing growth at the expense of stringent environmental regulations can lead to long-term detrimental effects. Environmental degradation not only harms public health but also threatens future economic stability by depleting natural resources and causing climate-related disasters. For example , poor air quality can increase healthcare costs and reduce workforce productivity. Likewise, integrating environmental considerations into economic planning can yield sustainable benefits. Renewable energy investments can create jobs and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, while sustainable agriculture can enhance food security and protect ecosystems. international pressure and global market trends are increasingly favoring environmentally responsible practices, which can open new economic opportunities for developing nations. Thus, a balanced approach is essential. While economic growth is crucial for immediate poverty alleviation and infrastructure development, it must not come at the cost of environmental sustainability. By adopting green technologies and enforcing reasonable environmental regulations, countries like India can achieve sustainable development that secures both economic prosperity and environmental health.
See less