Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
EVALUTION OF DIVORCE LAW
Divorce Laws and Women's Autonomy in India Evolving divorce laws significantly influence women's autonomy and societal attitudes in India. Traditionally, women were at a disadvantage due to stringent divorce laws favoring men. However, reforms like the Hindu Marriage Act,Muslim Women (Protection ofRead more
Divorce Laws and Women’s Autonomy in India
Evolving divorce laws significantly influence women’s autonomy and societal attitudes in India. Traditionally, women were at a disadvantage due to stringent divorce laws favoring men. However, reforms like the Hindu Marriage Act,Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, and subsequent amendments have granted women greater rights,including maintenance, custody, and property rights.
These legal changes empower women to exit abusive marriages, seek financial independence, and challenge patriarchal norms. They contribute to a shift in societal perceptions of women as independent entities with rights equal to men.Nevertheless, challenges persist due to social stigma, economic dependency, and discriminatory practices. While laws have progressed, their effective implementation and societal acceptance remain crucial for realizing true gender equality.
Evaluate the BNSS, it's impacts on criminal justice
Features of BNSS The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) introduces several key features, including mandatory forensic investigation for serious crimes, increased police powers with safeguards, stricter timelines for investigation and trial, and provisions for electronic evidence and proceedinRead more
Features of BNSS
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) introduces several key features, including mandatory forensic investigation for serious crimes, increased police powers with safeguards, stricter timelines for investigation and trial, and provisions for electronic evidence and proceedings. It also categorizes offenses into cognizable and non-cognizable,defining clear procedures for each.
Streamlining the Criminal Justice Process
The BNSS aims to enhance citizen security and streamline the criminal justice process by introducing specific timelines for investigation and trial, promoting the use of technology, and ensuring timely medical examination reports for victims.It also seeks to reduce the burden on courts by providing for electronic proceedings.
Potential Challenges
Implementing these changes may face challenges such as adequate training of police and judicial personnel in forensic science and technology, ensuring the effective implementation of timelines, and addressing potential misuse of increased police powers. Additionally, there might be resistance to the adoption of electronic systems in a country with varying levels of digital infrastructure.
Are the Fundamental rights superior to the Directive Principles. Give reasons for your answer
Yes, Fundamental Rights are generally considered superior to Directive Principles of State Policy. Fundamental Rights are enforceable by courts, ensuring their protection against state infringement. They are enshrined as justiciable, meaning individuals can seek legal redress if these rights are vioRead more
Yes, Fundamental Rights are generally considered superior to Directive Principles of State Policy.
Fundamental Rights are enforceable by courts, ensuring their protection against state infringement. They are enshrined as justiciable, meaning individuals can seek legal redress if these rights are violated. This makes them legally binding on the state.
In contrast, Directive Principles are not-justiciable, meaning they cannot be directly enforced by courts through lawsuits. They serve as guidelines for the state to strive for, guiding its policies towards social and economic welfare. While important, they do not override individual rights.
However, it’s crucial to note that the relationship between these two isn’t always clear-cut. In certain cases, courts have interpreted Directive Principles to inform the meaning and scope of Fundamental Rights, indicating a degree of interdependency.
Ultimately, the supremacy of Fundamental Rights is established through their justiciability and the guarantee of individual liberties.