1. . Supporting Women in Traditionally Male-Dominated industries: To assist women in traditionally male-dominated industries like engineering and finance, governments and organizations should establish focused scholarships, mentorship programs, and internships. Girls should be encouraged in STEM and financial literacy from an early age by educational institutions. More women may be encouraged to pursue these vocations by campaigns that dispel gender stereotypes and promote accomplished women in these sectors.
2. Affordably priced daycare has a significant impact on women’s workforce participation. This is because more women need to have access to cheap childcare. It enables women to maintain ongoing employment and minimize career disruptions by juggling work and family obligations. Governments can help with this by providing tax breaks for families, supporting employer-provided childcare, and subsidizing childcare services. This increases the number of women entering the labor market and fosters general economic expansion.
3. Resolving Gender-Based Violence: Vigorous legal enforcement, thorough legal frameworks, and public awareness efforts are necessary to combat gender-based violence. Legislation prohibiting sexual harassment, domestic abuse, and human trafficking ought to be strong and strictly enforced by the government. It’s also critical to offer survivors easily available support resources including therapy, shelters, and legal assistance. To make environments safer for women worldwide, education initiatives that support gender equality and question harmful practices are crucial.

The changes which have been introduced in the Indian Constitution in the recent past have shifted the balance of federal landscape and administration further to the Centre. For example, the Centre abrogated Article 370 in August 2019 and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, which made most of the state’s autonomy nugatory, reporting directly to New Delhi. This was a particularly clear sign of a more active and dominant policy on the part of the central government in relation to the states, especially in matters of a federal character. For instance, while the 101st amendment in 2017 has integrated GST, it has necessitated the centralisation of tax collections. While this aided in the process of tax simplification it restricted the autonomy of the states on fiscal policy and made them more dependent on central grants. These changes have impacted local governance by reducing the ability and capacity of the state government to tackle issues that are local or peculiar to any region. Battles over centralization of power occurred concerning the loss of control over the economy and the management of specific regions, and the consequences of this for variation and autonomy of states. In this regard the change has generated questions on the efficiency of regional governance structures and capacity of states to address population needs where there is no adequate decentralization.

This judgment of basic structure doctrine in the case of Kesavananda Bharathi Sripadagalvaru & Ors v State of Kerala & Anr (1973) was a landmark judgement to determine the change of subsequent constitutional amendments in the country of India. It holds that while the Parliament can alter the Constitution, the fundamental framework or Character of Constitution, meaning the principles of democracy, secularism, federal structure, and the rule of law cannot be removed by the Parliament.

This doctrine restricts the Parliament which is advantageous to preserve the pure form of the constitution. It also helps the judiciary to scrutinize the amendments and set them aside if they are against the spirit of the Constitution, as in the case of Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) connected with the 42nd Amendment.

Consequently, as per the basic structure, the doctrine shields the rights from gradual erosion by amendments while maintaining the Constitution’s stability. It also maintains a proper balance with the legislative branch to ensure that one does not encroach on the powers of the other and dilute key constitutional provisions. Altogether, the basic structure doctrine has come out as a very effective tool in the quest to safeguard the framework of the constitution in India.

Constitutional government is inherently a limited government and basic upon the constitution that defines and limits the government’s authority. In India, The Constitution serves as the country’s highest law; it describes the organization and powers of the state and its constraints. This avoids the accumulation of power by any branch of government such as the executive, the legislative or the judiciary since each branch has its own sphere of operation as is provided by the constitution.

The principles of limited government in operation within India include the principle of checks and balances under which the three arms of government conduct their own businesses in their own ways but are also tied to the other arms by certain healthy constraints. Fundamental Rights remains important in the Constitution as they serve to protect people’s freedoms against the state’s encroachment. The judiciary as a branch is capable of overturning laws or actions with the use of the judicial act that undermines the constitutional point, which also narrows down the executive branch powers. Furthermore, the US federalism system decentralizes power between the federal government and the 50 states, all under the presidency of Joe Biden.

By so doing, the limited government has the role of safeguarding the people from absolutism and anything that might compromise the exercise of government in a way that is transparent, accountable, and just. To that extent, by limiting the powers of the government, the Constitution guards against tyranny and maintains the pre-eminence of the rule of law and democratic processes through the encouragement of responsible government for the people.