In this situation, the most appropriate course of action would be to choose option (b): “Ask the athlete to return the medal.”

Justification:

1. Adherence to Rules: The age criteria for junior categories are established to ensure fair competition. By crossing the age limit, even by five days, the athlete has violated the established rules. Upholding these rules is essential for maintaining the integrity of the sport.
2. Fairness to Other Athletes: Allowing the athlete to retain the medal would undermine the efforts of other competitors who adhered to the age requirements. It is crucial to maintain a level playing field to ensure that all athletes have an equal chance of success.
3. Reputation of the Committee: As the Chairperson, it is my responsibility to uphold the integrity of the State Sports Committee. Taking decisive action reinforces the committee’s commitment to fairness and transparency, thereby enhancing its credibility.
4. Setting a Precedent: Returning the medal sends a strong message that rules must be followed, and any violations will be taken seriously. This can deter similar incidents in the future and encourage athletes to compete within the established guidelines.
5. Support for the Athlete: While returning the medal is necessary, I can still provide support by offering guidance on how the athlete can compete in the appropriate category in the future or seek other avenues to continue their sporting journey.

In summary, asking the athlete to return the medal is the most ethical and responsible decision that prioritizes fairness and integrity in sports.

In this situation, the best course of action would be to choose option (c): “Approve the office note to show that you do not indulge in favoritism.”

Justification:

1. Adherence to Rules: The rules for house allotment were established for a reason: to ensure fairness and transparency in the process. Approving the office note reinforces the importance of these regulations and maintains the integrity of the system.
2. Avoiding Favoritism: By not granting special treatment to my personal secretary, I demonstrate that personal relationships do not influence professional decisions. This helps establish a culture of equity in the workplace, fostering trust among all employees.
3. Long-term Impact: While it may be tempting to prioritize a close associate in a personal matter, doing so could lead to resentment among other staff members. Upholding the rules today sets a precedent for future decisions, ensuring that all employees feel equally valued.
4. Respect for Process: The office secretariat has already examined the request and recommended following the established procedure. By aligning my actions with their recommendations, I show respect for the collective decision-making process of the office.
5. Compassionate Communication: I can still express empathy towards my personal secretary’s situation. After the decision, I can offer support or alternative solutions, such as discussing other housing options or suggesting assistance for his father’s illness.

In summary, approving the office note is the most ethical and responsible action that prioritizes fairness and maintains professional integrity.