Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Planning Commission has scraped and replaced by a new think tanks, how it can be improved further?
If the Planning Commission has been replaced by new think tanks, there are several ways in which this new structure can be improved further: 1. Transparency and Accountability: This includes clear dissemination of their objectives, methodologies, and decision-making processes. AccountabilityRead more
If the Planning Commission has been replaced by new think tanks, there are several ways in which this new structure can be improved further:
1. Transparency and Accountability: This includes clear dissemination of their objectives, methodologies, and decision-making processes. Accountability mechanisms should be put in place to ensure that the think tanks are accountable to the public and stakeholders.
2. Expertise and Independence: Ensure that the think tanks are staffed with experts from diverse fields relevant to economic and social development.
3. Consultative Approach: Foster a consultative approach where the think tanks engage with a wide range of stakeholders including government officials, academia, industry representatives, and civil society organizations.
4. Long-term Vision and Strategy: This should include setting clear goals and objectives, and regularly assessing progress towards achieving them.
5. Research and Innovation: Foster collaboration with universities, research institutions, and international think tanks to leverage global best practices and expertise.
By focusing on these aspects, the new think tanks can effectively fulfill their role in driving sustainable development and addressing the complex challenges faced by the country.
See lessPrimary objective of the First Indian Amendment Act
The primary objective of the First Amendment Act, 1951, in India was to curtail certain fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. It aimed to amend Article 19 to impose restrictions on freedom of speech and expression, freedom to assemble peacefully, and freedom to form associations or uRead more
The primary objective of the First Amendment Act, 1951, in India was to curtail certain fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
It aimed to amend Article 19 to impose restrictions on freedom of speech and expression, freedom to assemble peacefully, and freedom to form associations or unions.
These amendments were primarily driven by concerns over national security and public order in the aftermath of Partition and the challenges of nation-building.
Key provisions of the First Amendment Act, 1951, included:
1. Imposition of Reasonable Restrictions: It added clauses to Article 19 that allowed the state to impose “reasonable restrictions” on freedom of speech and expression, freedom to assemble peacefully, and freedom to form associations or unions in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India.
2. Land Reform Laws: The Act inserted Article 31A and Article 31B to validate land reform laws that sought to abolish intermediaries and redistribute land to the tillers.
3. Validation of Certain Acts: It validated certain laws that had been challenged on grounds of infringing fundamental rights, thereby securing legal backing for legislative measures deemed essential for governance and societal stability.
Impact of Amendments to Directive Principles on Socio-Economic Development in India
The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in India are guidelines or principles laid down in Part IV of the Constitution, which are not enforceable by courts but are meant to guide the state in making laws and policies. Their impact on socio-economic development in India can be analyzed as folRead more
The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in India are guidelines or principles laid down in Part IV of the Constitution, which are not enforceable by courts but are meant to guide the state in making laws and policies.
Their impact on socio-economic development in India can be analyzed as follows:
1. Social Welfare Policies : The DPSP emphasize the state’s role in promoting the welfare of the people by securing and protecting various rights, such as education, health, and equal pay for equal work.
2. Land Reforms and Agricultural Development : Amendments have supported agrarian reforms, tenant rights, and redistribution of land to landless farmers.
4. Equal Justice and Legal Aid : Amendments focusing on equal justice and legal aid have influenced policies to provide legal assistance to the economically disadvantaged sections of society, ensuring access to justice and promoting socio-economic equity.
5. Environmental Protection and Conservation : Amendments have addressed environmental protection and conservation, influencing policies aimed at sustainable development, pollution control, and conservation of natural resources.
6. Empowerment of Weaker Sections : DPSP amendments have underscored the state’s obligation to promote the welfare of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and other weaker sections of society.
See lessChallenges in Implementing Communist Ideologies Globally: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
Implementing communist ideologies in diverse global contexts has historically and contemporarily faced several challenges: 1. Cultural and Social Diversity: Communist ideologies often aim to homogenize society under a single framework, which can clash with existing cultural diversity and traditions.Read more
Implementing communist ideologies in diverse global contexts has historically and contemporarily faced several challenges:
1. Cultural and Social Diversity: Communist ideologies often aim to homogenize society under a single framework, which can clash with existing cultural diversity and traditions.
2. Economic Realities: Communist ideologies typically advocate for centralized planning and state control over the economy. Transitioning from capitalist to communist economic systems can disrupt established economic relationships and lead to economic inefficiencies.
3. Political Opposition: Communist regimes historically faced opposition from existing political structures.
4. Human Rights Concerns: The concentration of power in the state and suppression of dissent can lead to violations of human rights.
6. Environmental Sustainability : The balance between industrialization and environmental protection can be challenging to achieve under centralized planning.
See less