Empowering Urban Local Bodies in India Urban local bodies (ULBs) are vital for local governance, yet their functional and financial empowerment remains a challenge. Functional Empowerment: Challenges: ULBs often lack autonomy due to dependency on state governments. Decision-making delays and inefficRead more
Empowering Urban Local Bodies in India
Urban local bodies (ULBs) are vital for local governance, yet their functional and financial empowerment remains a challenge.
Functional Empowerment:
Challenges: ULBs often lack autonomy due to dependency on state governments. Decision-making delays and inefficiencies result.
Solutions: States must devolve more powers to ULBs and invest in capacity building.
Financial Empowerment:
Challenges: Inadequate resources and reliance on state grants hinder ULBs.
Solutions: ULBs should explore local revenue sources (property tax, user charges) and states should allocate a fixed percentage of revenue to ULBs.
Political Will and Accountability:
Challenges: Political interference and lack of accountability affect ULBs.
Solutions: Transparent local elections and citizen participation can enhance accountability.
Legal Framework:
Challenges: Outdated municipal laws and inconsistent implementation.
Solutions: States should adopt modern legislation and establish monitoring mechanisms.
In conclusion, holistic reforms—legal, financial, and political—are essential to empower ULBs and improve urban governance.
Comparing British and Indian Approaches to Parliamentary Sovereignty British and Indian approaches to parliamentary sovereignty reflect their distinct legal and constitutional frameworks. In the UK, parliamentary sovereignty is a fundamental principle, meaning that Parliament can make or repeal anyRead more
Comparing British and Indian Approaches to Parliamentary Sovereignty
British and Indian approaches to parliamentary sovereignty reflect their distinct legal and constitutional frameworks. In the UK, parliamentary sovereignty is a fundamental principle, meaning that Parliament can make or repeal any law, and no other body can override or challenge its decisions. This principle underpins the UK’s uncodified constitution, allowing Parliament to have supreme legislative authority.
Conversely, India’s approach to parliamentary sovereignty is influenced by its written Constitution, which delineates the powers and limits of Parliament. While Indian Parliament has significant legislative authority, it operates within the constraints of the Constitution. The Indian Constitution is supreme, and Parliament cannot enact laws that violate its provisions. This framework introduces a system of checks and balances, where judicial review ensures that laws comply with constitutional principles, thus limiting Parliament’s sovereignty.
In summary, while British parliamentary sovereignty grants unrestricted legislative power to Parliament, India’s approach integrates constitutional constraints, balancing legislative authority with adherence to constitutional norms.
See less