The notion that discrimination is “in our blood” is an overly simplistic and reductive view of human behaviour. As this is well known that there is no logical explanation of discrimination, so it serves as a convenient excuse for those who benefit from and wish to perpetuate this illogical practice. It shadows the sufferings of those who are victims of discrimination.

This notion suggests that discrimination is in our blood. Indeed, even a mother and her child can have different blood types, and every person has a different face. But does that mean we should discriminate based on every differences?

While humans may have inherent biological biases, these are more accurately described as “differentiation” rather than “discrimination.” The argument that differences in blood groups or facial features justify discrimination is flawed. Differentiation is a natural occurrence, but it does not necessitate discriminatory behaviour. Many people argue that nature’s diversity is what makes the world beautiful and complete. Imagining a world where everything is identical would indeed be dull; diversity enriches our lives and fosters creativity and innovation.

Nature has created differences with the aim of promoting “diversity” and not “discrimination.” This diversity should be embraced with inclusivity and unity. The concept of “unity in diversity” directly contradicts the notion that discrimination is inherent. Nature did not create anyone or anything complete in itself; rather, it created diverse elements to complement and complete each other.

Thus, while differences are everywhere, they exist to enhance diversity, not to justify discrimination. Embracing diversity with inclusivity and unity leads to a more complete and harmonious world.