Introduction: Under this doctrine, if a transferor confers certain benefits upon a person and also imposes certain liability then the person should either accept the whole transfer or reject it entirely. It is based upon the principle of Estoppel where a person who approves a part of transaction which is beneficial to him and rejects that part which is detrimental to him is not allowed.
Ingredients of Section 35:
1. A person who is not the owner can not transfer property but he can make arrangements for the property.
2. In lieu of the transfer, the transferor confers certain benefits upon the owner of the property.
Suspension of Election: When at the time of transfer the owner is legally disabled then his duty to elect is suspended during his minority or lunacy until the disability ceases. Although election can also be made by his legal guardian even before the disability ceases.
Conclusion: The person who professes to transfer must confer some benefit upon the owner of the property. Where he accepts the instrument then he is entitled to benefit but he is bound to transfer his property. If he elects to reject the instrument he can not claim the benefit.

Introduction: Under this doctrine, if a transferor confers certain benefits upon a person and also imposes certain liability then the person should either accept the whole transfer or reject it entirely. It is based upon the principle of Estoppel where a person who approves a part of transaction which is beneficial to him and rejects that part which is detrimental to him is not allowed.
Ingredients of Section 35:
1. A person who is not the owner can not transfer property but he can make arrangements for the property.
2. In lieu of the transfer, the transferor confers certain benefits upon the owner of the property.
Suspension of Election: When at the time of transfer the owner is legally disabled then his duty to elect is suspended during his minority or lunacy until the disability ceases. Although election can also be made by his legal guardian even before the disability ceases.
Conclusion: The person who professes to transfer must confer some benefit upon the owner of the property. Where he accepts the instrument then he is entitled to benefit but he is bound to transfer his property. If he elects to reject the instrument he can not claim the benefit.

Introduction: Under this doctrine, if a transferor confers certain benefits upon a person and also imposes certain liability then the person should either accept the whole transfer or reject it entirely. It is based upon the principle of Estoppel where a person who approves a part of transaction which is beneficial to him and rejects that part which is detrimental to him is not allowed.
Ingredients of Section 35:
1. A person who is not the owner can not transfer property but he can make arrangements for the property.
2. In lieu of the transfer, the transferor confers certain benefits upon the owner of the property.
Suspension of Election: When at the time of transfer the owner is legally disabled then his duty to elect is suspended during his minority or lunacy until the disability ceases. Although election can also be made by his legal guardian even before the disability ceases.
Conclusion: The person who professes to transfer must confer some benefit upon the owner of the property. Where he accepts the instrument then he is entitled to benefit but he is bound to transfer his property. If he elects to reject the instrument he can not claim the benefit.

Introduction: Under this doctrine, if a transferor confers certain benefits upon a person and also imposes certain liability then the person should either accept the whole transfer or reject it entirely. It is based upon the principle of Estoppel where a person who approves a part of transaction which is beneficial to him and rejects that part which is detrimental to him is not allowed.
Ingredients of Section 35:
1. A person who is not the owner can not transfer property but he can make arrangements for the property.
2. In lieu of the transfer, the transferor confers certain benefits upon the owner of the property.
Suspension of Election: When at the time of transfer the owner is legally disabled then his duty to elect is suspended during his minority or lunacy until the disability ceases. Although election can also be made by his legal guardian even before the disability ceases.
Conclusion: The person who professes to transfer must confer some benefit upon the owner of the property. Where he accepts the instrument then he is entitled to benefit but he is bound to transfer his property. If he elects to reject the instrument he can not claim the benefit.

Introduction: Under this doctrine, if a transferor confers certain benefits upon a person and also imposes certain liability then the person should either accept the whole transfer or reject it entirely. It is based upon the principle of Estoppel where a person who approves a part of transaction which is beneficial to him and rejects that part which is detrimental to him is not allowed.
Ingredients of Section 35:
1. A person who is not the owner can not transfer property but he can make arrangements for the property.
2. In lieu of the transfer, the transferor confers certain benefits upon the owner of the property.
Suspension of Election: When at the time of transfer the owner is legally disabled then his duty to elect is suspended during his minority or lunacy until the disability ceases. Although election can also be made by his legal guardian even before the disability ceases.
Conclusion: The person who professes to transfer must confer some benefit upon the owner of the property. Where he accepts the instrument then he is entitled to benefit but he is bound to transfer his property. If he elects to reject the instrument he can not claim the benefit.