Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
There is a growing divergence in the relationship between poverty and hunger in India. The shrinking of social expenditure by the government is forcing the poor to spend more on non-food essential items squeezing their food-budget. – Elucidate. (150 words) [UPSC 2019]
The divergence between poverty and hunger in India highlights a critical issue: while poverty levels may appear to decrease, hunger persists due to shifting expenditure patterns among the poor. Growing Divergence: Shrinking Social Expenditure: Reduced government spending on social welfare programs iRead more
The divergence between poverty and hunger in India highlights a critical issue: while poverty levels may appear to decrease, hunger persists due to shifting expenditure patterns among the poor.
Growing Divergence:
Conclusion: Effective policy must balance social expenditure to ensure that poverty reduction translates into improved food security. Prioritizing comprehensive support programs can help bridge the gap between poverty alleviation and hunger eradication.
See lessImplementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects/Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation. (150 words) [UPSC 2019]
Challenges in ICT-based Projects/Programs: Infrastructure Limitations: Poor or inadequate infrastructure can hinder the effective implementation of ICT projects. This includes unreliable internet connectivity, outdated hardware, and insufficient technical support. Lack of Skilled Personnel: InsufficRead more
Challenges in ICT-based Projects/Programs:
Measures for Effective Implementation:
Addressing these factors can improve the successful deployment and sustainability of ICT-based projects, leading to enhanced efficiency and effectiveness.
See less‘The time has come for India and Japan to build a strong contemporary relationship, one involving global and strategic partnership that will have a great significance for Asia and the world as a whole.’ Comment. (150 words) [UPSC 2019]
The evolving geopolitical landscape underscores the necessity for a robust India-Japan partnership, extending beyond traditional ties to a strategic and global framework. Strategic Significance: Both nations share common interests in maintaining regional stability, particularly in the Indo-Pacific rRead more
The evolving geopolitical landscape underscores the necessity for a robust India-Japan partnership, extending beyond traditional ties to a strategic and global framework.
Strategic Significance: Both nations share common interests in maintaining regional stability, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, where China’s assertiveness is a concern. Strengthening their strategic partnership can balance regional power dynamics and enhance security cooperation.
Economic Collaboration: India and Japan, as major economies in Asia, can benefit from deepened economic ties. Japan’s expertise in technology, infrastructure, and investment complements India’s growth aspirations. Joint ventures in infrastructure projects and technology transfer can spur economic growth and innovation.
Global Impact: A strong India-Japan alliance can shape global norms, from sustainable development to climate action. Their partnership could lead to collaborative efforts in addressing global challenges, thereby enhancing their influence on the world stage.
Conclusion: Building a contemporary and strategic relationship will not only benefit both nations but also contribute significantly to regional and global stability and prosperity.
See less‘Too little cash, too much politics, leaves UNESCO fighting for life.’ Discuss the statement in the light of US’ withdrawal and its accusation of the cultural body as being ‘anti-Israel bias’. (150 words) [UPSC 2019]
The statement "Too little cash, too much politics, leaves UNESCO fighting for life" reflects the challenges UNESCO faces amidst financial constraints and political controversies. The United States' withdrawal from UNESCO in 2018 due to allegations of "anti-Israel bias" exacerbates these challenges.Read more
The statement “Too little cash, too much politics, leaves UNESCO fighting for life” reflects the challenges UNESCO faces amidst financial constraints and political controversies. The United States’ withdrawal from UNESCO in 2018 due to allegations of “anti-Israel bias” exacerbates these challenges.
Financial Constraints: UNESCO has struggled with funding shortages, partly due to the U.S. withholding its contributions. This financial shortfall impacts its ability to carry out vital educational, scientific, and cultural programs globally.
Political Controversies: The U.S. accused UNESCO of bias against Israel, particularly criticizing resolutions concerning Israeli actions in Palestinian territories. The withdrawal highlighted how political disputes can undermine the effectiveness and credibility of international bodies.
Impact: The combination of insufficient funds and political disputes weakens UNESCO’s capacity to fulfill its mandate and hampers its role in promoting international cooperation in education, science, and culture. This situation poses a threat to its long-term viability and effectiveness.
See lessOn what grounds a people’s representative can be disqualified under the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951? Also mention the remedies available to such person against his disqualification. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Grounds for Disqualification of a People's Representative under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Introduction: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, outlines the grounds on which a person can be disqualified from holding office as a member of Parliament or a State Legislature in IndiRead more
Grounds for Disqualification of a People’s Representative under the Representation of the People Act, 1951
Introduction: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, outlines the grounds on which a person can be disqualified from holding office as a member of Parliament or a State Legislature in India. These grounds ensure that elected representatives adhere to legal and ethical standards.
Grounds for Disqualification:
Remedies Available:
Conclusion: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, provides a framework for disqualifying people’s representatives to maintain integrity and transparency in elections. Remedies such as appeals and constitutional challenges ensure that individuals have avenues to seek redress and reinstate their eligibility.
See less"Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power." In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power? (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Limits of Parliament’s Power to Amend the Constitution and the Basic Structure Doctrine Introduction: Article 368 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend the Constitution. However, the extent and limits of this power have been a subject of significant legal and constitutionalRead more
Limits of Parliament’s Power to Amend the Constitution and the Basic Structure Doctrine
Introduction: Article 368 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend the Constitution. However, the extent and limits of this power have been a subject of significant legal and constitutional debate. The key question is whether Parliament, under this provision, can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power.
Article 368 and Parliamentary Power: Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution by way of adding, varying, or repealing provisions. This power, however, is not absolute. While Parliament can amend the Constitution to address changing needs and circumstances, this power is circumscribed by the fundamental principles underlying the Constitution.
Basic Structure Doctrine: The Basic Structure Doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973). The doctrine holds that certain fundamental features of the Constitution, which form its basic structure, cannot be altered or destroyed by amendments. These features include the supremacy of the Constitution, federalism, secularism, democracy, and the rule of law.
Parliamentary Limits: According to the Basic Structure Doctrine, Parliament’s amending power under Article 368 does not extend to altering or destroying the basic structure of the Constitution. This limitation ensures that fundamental principles remain intact despite changes in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has reaffirmed this doctrine in subsequent cases, emphasizing that while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot use this power to undermine its core principles.
Judicial Oversight: The judiciary plays a crucial role in overseeing and ensuring that constitutional amendments do not infringe upon the basic structure. The power of judicial review allows the courts to examine amendments and ensure they comply with the Constitution’s core principles. This oversight mechanism acts as a check on the potential misuse of amending power by Parliament.
Conclusion: While Parliament under Article 368 has substantial power to amend the Constitution, this power is not limitless. The Basic Structure Doctrine ensures that Parliament cannot destroy the Constitution’s fundamental principles through amendments. Judicial oversight further reinforces this limitation, maintaining the integrity and stability of the Constitution while allowing for necessary changes and adaptations.
See less"The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self-government has had a limited impact on the patriarchal character of the Indian Political Process." Comment. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Impact of Women's Reservation in Local Self-Government on the Patriarchal Character of Indian Politics Introduction: The reservation of seats for women in local self-government institutions, such as Panchayats and Municipalities, was introduced with the aim of enhancing female political participatioRead more
Impact of Women’s Reservation in Local Self-Government on the Patriarchal Character of Indian Politics
Introduction: The reservation of seats for women in local self-government institutions, such as Panchayats and Municipalities, was introduced with the aim of enhancing female political participation and addressing gender disparities. Despite this significant step towards gender inclusion, the impact on the patriarchal nature of the Indian political process has been limited.
Limited Empowerment and Influence: While the reservation policy has increased the number of women in local governance, it has not necessarily translated into increased empowerment or influence. Many women elected under the reservation quotas often face constraints imposed by their male counterparts or family members who may retain control over decision-making processes. This phenomenon, known as the “proxy” or “pseudonym” problem, sees women acting as figureheads while male relatives or party leaders exercise real authority.
Persistence of Patriarchal Norms: Patriarchal norms continue to dominate political and social structures in India. These norms influence how women in politics are perceived and treated. Women leaders often confront societal expectations and traditional gender roles that undermine their authority and effectiveness. This societal backdrop can restrict their ability to influence policy or drive meaningful change.
Lack of Supportive Infrastructure: The success of female participation in local governance also depends on the availability of supportive infrastructure and resources. In many cases, women leaders face challenges such as inadequate training, limited access to resources, and insufficient support from political parties. These factors can hinder their capacity to perform effectively and challenge existing patriarchal structures.
Gradual Change and Potential: Despite these challenges, the reservation policy has had some positive effects. It has brought women into the political sphere, created role models, and gradually altered public perceptions of women in leadership. Over time, this increased representation can contribute to more substantial changes in the patriarchal nature of Indian politics.
Conclusion: The reservation of seats for women in local self-government institutions represents a critical step towards gender equality, but its impact on dismantling the patriarchal character of Indian politics has been limited. To achieve meaningful change, there must be a concerted effort to address societal norms, provide support and training, and ensure that women leaders can exercise real influence in governance. Enhancing these aspects can contribute to a more equitable and representative political process.
See less"The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India." Discuss. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Role of the Attorney-General as Chief Legal Adviser and Lawyer of the Government of India Introduction: The Attorney-General of India plays a crucial role as the chief legal adviser and lawyer for the Government of India. Appointed by the President under Article 76 of the Indian Constitution, the AtRead more
Role of the Attorney-General as Chief Legal Adviser and Lawyer of the Government of India
Introduction: The Attorney-General of India plays a crucial role as the chief legal adviser and lawyer for the Government of India. Appointed by the President under Article 76 of the Indian Constitution, the Attorney-General’s duties and functions are vital for ensuring the legal integrity of governmental actions and policies.
Chief Legal Adviser: As the chief legal adviser, the Attorney-General provides legal opinions and advice to the Government of India on various matters. This role involves interpreting laws, guiding on the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, and advising on complex legal issues that arise in the course of governance. The Attorney-General’s advice is sought on significant issues, including the drafting of legislation, amendments to laws, and legal strategies for government litigation.
Representation in Court: The Attorney-General represents the Government of India in the Supreme Court and other courts. This includes defending the government in cases challenging the validity of its actions, policies, or legislation. The Attorney-General’s representation is crucial in high-profile cases that have broader implications for national governance and constitutional matters.
Legal Strategy and Policy: The Attorney-General also plays a role in formulating legal strategies and policies for the government. This involves advising on the implications of legal decisions, potential legal risks, and the drafting of legal documents and submissions. The Attorney-General’s role ensures that the government’s legal positions are well-founded and robust.
Impartiality and Independence: Despite being appointed by the President and serving at the pleasure of the government, the Attorney-General is expected to maintain impartiality and independence in their legal advice. This ensures that the legal opinions provided are based on the law and not influenced by political considerations.
Challenges and Limitations: The Attorney-General’s role comes with challenges, including the potential for conflicts of interest if the legal advice provided aligns closely with political agendas. Additionally, the Attorney-General’s position does not provide security of tenure, which may affect the ability to offer independent advice.
Conclusion: The Attorney-General of India is a pivotal figure in the legal framework of the Indian government, serving as the chief legal adviser and representing the government in legal matters. The role requires a balance of legal expertise, impartiality, and strategic insight, crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring the effective functioning of the government.
See lessThe need for cooperation among various service sectors has been an inherent component of development discourse. Partnership bridges the gap among the sectors. It also sets in motion a culture of ‘collaboration’ and ‘team spirit’. In the light of statements above examine India’s development process. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Cooperation and Partnership in India’s Development Process Introduction: Cooperation among various service sectors has become a fundamental aspect of India’s development strategy. The emphasis on partnerships not only bridges gaps between sectors but also fosters a culture of collaboration and teamRead more
Cooperation and Partnership in India’s Development Process
Introduction: Cooperation among various service sectors has become a fundamental aspect of India’s development strategy. The emphasis on partnerships not only bridges gaps between sectors but also fosters a culture of collaboration and team spirit, crucial for achieving holistic and sustainable development.
Integration of Sectors: India’s development process benefits greatly from the integration of diverse sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure. For instance, the convergence of health and education sectors is evident in programs like the National Health Mission (NHM), which aligns with the mid-day meal scheme to improve nutritional outcomes and educational attendance. This integrated approach ensures that interventions are more comprehensive and address multiple dimensions of development simultaneously.
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Public-Private Partnerships have become a key mechanism in advancing infrastructure and services in India. Projects like the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) and the Smart Cities Mission exemplify how collaboration between the government and private sector can drive large-scale development initiatives. These partnerships leverage private sector efficiency and investment to enhance public infrastructure and service delivery.
Multi-Sectoral Approaches: Addressing complex development challenges requires a multi-sectoral approach. Programs such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) and the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) integrate efforts across different sectors like rural development, infrastructure, and local governance. This ensures that development efforts are aligned and mutually reinforcing, leading to more effective outcomes.
Culture of Collaboration: The promotion of a collaborative culture is vital for effective development. Initiatives like the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) emphasize cooperation among government agencies, NGOs, and community organizations. This collaborative environment fosters shared responsibility and a unified approach to tackling development challenges.
Challenges and Opportunities: Despite the benefits, challenges such as bureaucratic inertia, conflicting interests, and resource constraints can impede effective cooperation. Addressing these challenges requires streamlined processes, better coordination mechanisms, and a focus on aligning objectives across sectors.
Conclusion: In India’s development process, cooperation and partnership among various service sectors are essential for bridging gaps, enhancing efficiency, and fostering a culture of collaboration. Emphasizing integrated approaches and addressing challenges in coordination can lead to more comprehensive and effective development outcomes, ultimately contributing to sustainable progress.
See lessIndividual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Decline in Individual Parliamentarian's Role and Its Impact on Legislative Quality Introduction: The role of individual Parliamentarians as national lawmakers in India has been diminishing, which has adversely affected the quality of debates and legislative outcomes. This shift has significant impliRead more
Decline in Individual Parliamentarian’s Role and Its Impact on Legislative Quality
Introduction: The role of individual Parliamentarians as national lawmakers in India has been diminishing, which has adversely affected the quality of debates and legislative outcomes. This shift has significant implications for the effectiveness of democratic processes and the functioning of the legislature.
Reduced Individual Influence: Traditionally, individual Parliamentarians played a crucial role in shaping legislation through active participation in debates, discussions, and committee work. However, the increasing centralization of power within party leadership and the executive branch has reduced individual contributions. Party whips and leadership directives often limit independent thought and debate, thereby marginalizing the role of individual legislators in policy-making.
Impact on Quality of Debates: The decline in individual Parliamentarians’ roles has negatively impacted the quality of parliamentary debates. Limited opportunities for substantive discussion mean that debates often become superficial, with Members of Parliament (MPs) adhering strictly to party lines rather than engaging in critical analysis and constructive dialogue. This reduction in meaningful scrutiny affects the thorough examination of bills and diminishes the quality of legislative discourse.
Reduced Legislative Oversight: Effective legislative oversight requires active and informed participation from individual MPs. As their role diminishes, there is a decrease in rigorous questioning of executive actions and policies. This decline in oversight weakens accountability, as fewer MPs are engaged in detailed examination of government performance and expenditure, thereby diminishing the checks and balances system.
Dependence on Whip System: The party whip system has become more pronounced, with MPs often required to vote in line with party directives rather than personal or constituency interests. This centralization of voting power limits individual MPs’ ability to advocate for diverse viewpoints, thereby impacting the diversity of debates and legislative outcomes.
Potential for Reform: To address these issues, reforms could focus on enhancing the autonomy of individual MPs and promoting greater transparency and accountability within the legislative process. Encouraging more robust parliamentary committees and providing opportunities for MPs to engage in in-depth discussions could improve the quality of legislative work.
Conclusion: The diminishing role of individual Parliamentarians has adversely affected the quality of parliamentary debates and legislative outcomes. Reforms aimed at restoring individual influence and enhancing legislative scrutiny are essential for improving the effectiveness of the parliamentary system and ensuring more comprehensive and representative law-making processes.
See less