The statement that “the current political developments in Bangladesh have a smell of Left-wing extremism” requires careful consideration of Bangladesh’s political context and recent developments. Let’s examine the arguments for and against this characterization:

Arguments in Defense of the Statement
Historical Context and Left-Wing Influence:

Historical Left-Wing Movements: Bangladesh has a history of left-wing movements, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, which included various Marxist and socialist groups. The influence of such movements in the past might contribute to the perception of current developments having a “smell” of left-wing extremism.
Current Left-Wing Parties: Some left-leaning parties or factions might still be active in Bangladesh’s political landscape. If their influence is growing, it could be seen as a shift towards more radical leftist policies.
Policy Shifts:

Economic Policies: If the current government or opposition is implementing or advocating for policies that heavily favor state control over the economy, wealth redistribution, or extensive social welfare programs, these could be viewed as indicative of left-wing extremism.
Regulation and Reform: Aggressive reforms or regulations aimed at redistributing wealth or limiting corporate power might be seen as leftist in nature.
Political Rhetoric:

Public Discourse: If political leaders or groups are using rhetoric that is explicitly Marxist or socialist, this could contribute to the perception of left-wing extremism. This includes criticism of capitalism or calls for radical social change.
Arguments Refuting the Statement
Current Government’s Ideology:

Political Context: The ruling party in Bangladesh, the Awami League, is generally considered centrist or center-left rather than extremist. While it may support some social welfare initiatives, this does not necessarily align with left-wing extremism.
Policy Focus: The government’s policies might focus more on economic development and stability rather than radical leftist ideologies. They might implement social programs, but these are often in line with broader developmental goals rather than extreme leftist agendas.
Opposition Dynamics:

Opposition Parties: The major opposition parties, like the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), are typically center-right or conservative, and their policies do not align with left-wing extremism. Their criticism of the government does not necessarily indicate a leftist turn.
Civil Society and Activism:

Civil Society Influence: Bangladesh’s civil society and various activist groups often focus on issues like human rights, democratic governance, and social justice rather than advocating for left-wing extremism. Their influence, while significant, does not necessarily reflect a broader trend towards left-wing extremism.
Economic and Political Realities:

Realpolitik: The economic and political realities in Bangladesh, including its dependence on international aid and investment, often limit the extent to which extreme leftist policies can be implemented. The need for economic stability and international relations typically moderates policy shifts.
Conclusion
Whether or not current political developments in Bangladesh reflect left-wing extremism depends on how one defines and interprets extremism and leftist ideologies. While there may be elements of left-leaning policies or rhetoric, this does not necessarily mean that left-wing extremism is driving the political landscape.

The current political developments might better be understood in the context of broader political, economic, and social factors rather than a straightforward label of left-wing extremism. It’s essential to analyze specific policies, party platforms, and the broader political environment to accurately assess the nature of political trends in Bangladesh.