Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Analyze the constitutional mechanisms for the resolution of disputes between the Union and the states, or among the states themselves. Discuss the role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating such conflicts.
India has a federal system and hence it becomes important for union and state to work cooperatively. therefore, some constitutional mechanisms are made to keep the relationship frictionless. article 245 to 293 specify the legislative , administrative and financial relations to avoid any overlappingRead more
India has a federal system and hence it becomes important for union and state to work cooperatively. therefore, some constitutional mechanisms are made to keep the relationship frictionless. article 245 to 293 specify the legislative , administrative and financial relations to avoid any overlapping of power. the disputes are constitutionally solved through – inter state council under article 263 which inquires , investigate and make recommendations on the disputes between state and union or inter state, original jurisdiction of supreme court under article 131, zonal council and article 136 which allows the state government to move to courts for challenging the judgments of the tribunals specially in case of water disputes.
supreme court under article 131 exercises its original jurisdiction to solve disputes directly. The dispute may be related to a law and legal rights. However the jurisdiction of supreme court can be excluded by a treaty or agreement.
the court has exercised this power in cases like West Bengal vs Gov of India 2017 etc. The court can check the validity of law in terms of basic structure, violation of rights and excess of legislative competence. In doing so, court has made federal fabric of the constitution more strong.
See less
Analyze the constitutional mechanisms for the resolution of disputes between the Union and the states, or among the states themselves. Discuss the role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating such conflicts.
India has a federal system and hence it becomes important for union and state to work cooperatively. therefore, some constitutional mechanisms are made to keep the relationship frictionless. article 245 to 293 specify the legislative , administrative and financial relations to avoid any overlappingRead more
India has a federal system and hence it becomes important for union and state to work cooperatively. therefore, some constitutional mechanisms are made to keep the relationship frictionless. article 245 to 293 specify the legislative , administrative and financial relations to avoid any overlapping of power. the disputes are constitutionally solved through – inter state council under article 263 which inquires , investigate and make recommendations on the disputes between state and union or inter state, original jurisdiction of supreme court under article 131, zonal council and article 136 which allows the state government to move to courts for challenging the judgments of the tribunals specially in case of water disputes.
supreme court under article 131 exercises its original jurisdiction to solve disputes directly. The dispute may be related to a law and legal rights. However the jurisdiction of supreme court can be excluded by a treaty or agreement.
the court has exercised this power in cases like West Bengal vs Gov of India 2017 etc. The court can check the validity of law in terms of basic structure, violation of rights and excess of legislative competence. In doing so, court has made federal fabric of the constitution more strong.
See less