Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
There are similarities and interactions between the affirmative action adopted by India and USA owing to similar historical injustices faced by their respective vulnerable groups. Discuss.
Both India and the USA have enacted affirmative action measures to foster equality for their respective disadvantaged populations and to remedy historical injustices. Due to the historical prejudice and marginalization of specific communities in both countries, aggressive steps are required to addreRead more
Both India and the USA have enacted affirmative action measures to foster equality for their respective disadvantaged populations and to remedy historical injustices. Due to the historical prejudice and marginalization of specific communities in both countries, aggressive steps are required to address these injustices. The caste system has been a major source of prejudice in India for millennia, with Dalits and other lower-caste groups experiencing systematic oppression. To give these excluded people chances, the Indian government has instituted affirmative action programs, such as reservations in employment and education. Similar to this, affirmative action programs have been put in place in the USA to support diversity and inclusion in employment and education as a result of discrimination and inequality experienced by African Americans and other minority groups.
Affirmative action implementation has presented difficulties for both nations, including disagreements on the efficacy and justice of these laws. Proponents of these policies contend that they are required to remedy historical injustices and advance equitable opportunities for all, while critics claim that they can result in reverse discrimination or reinforce prejudices. Additionally, both nations have struggled with inclusion and representation in their affirmative action programs. Debates concerning expanding reservations to other oppressed groups, such economically disadvantaged populations or religious minorities, have taken place in India. In a similar vein, discussions over the inclusion of women and LGBTQ+ people, among other underrepresented groups, in affirmative action initiatives have taken place in the USA.
Despite these difficulties, there is a common commitment to correcting historical injustices and advancing equality for marginalized groups evident in the similarities between the affirmative action laws of the USA and India. Both nations recognize the need to take proactive steps to address historical injustice and advance inclusivity in order to build a more just society that benefits all.
See less