Who Proposed Lokpal at the Central Level for the First Time in India?

Introduction

The idea of establishing the Lokpal at the central level was first proposed by Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1963.

Key Points

• Lal Bahadur Shastri: He was the Prime Minister of India who proposed the creation of a Lokpal.
• 1963: The proposal was made in response to increasing concerns about corruption.

Illustrations

• Corruption Issues: During Shastri’s tenure, there was growing dissatisfaction with corruption in government.
• Parliamentary Effort: The proposal led to the drafting of a bill, but it was not passed at that time.

Conclusion

Though Shastri’s idea wasn’t implemented immediately, it laid the foundation for the later push to establish Lokpal.

Who is Known as ‘Watchdog’ in India?

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India is called the “watchdog” of public finance.

Role of the CAG

• Audit of Government Accounts: The CAG audits government finances to ensure public funds are used properly.
  • Example: Auditing government spending on welfare schemes to check if funds are utilized effectively.
• Ensuring Accountability: The CAG helps ensure transparency in the use of taxpayer money and reports any mismanagement or irregularities.
• Reports to Parliament: The CAG submits audit reports to Parliament, which hold the government accountable for public spending.

By performing these duties, the CAG plays a crucial role in safeguarding public finance in India.

Three Main Divisions of the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.)

The Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) has three main divisions that focus on different types of crimes.

1. Anti-Corruption Division

• Focuses on investigating cases of corruption involving public officials.
• Example: Investigating bribery or misuse of office by government employees.

2. Special Crime Division

• Handles serious crimes such as murder, terrorism, and organized crime.
• Example: Investigating high-profile murder cases or terrorist attacks.

3. Economic Offences Division

• Deals with financial crimes, frauds, and economic offenses.
• Example: Investigating banking frauds or scams involving large financial institutions.

These divisions help the C.B.I. tackle a wide range of criminal activities across India.

Indian Book on Corruption

The Arthashastra, written by Kautilya (Chanakya), refers to various forms of corruption in governance and administration.

Corruption in Arthashastra

• Bribery: Kautilya discusses how bribery can corrupt officials, leading to misuse of power.
• Nepotism: The book warns against favoritism and appointing unqualified individuals based on personal connections rather than merit.
• Exploitation: Arthashastra also highlights exploitation of the public by rulers and officials for personal gain.

Kautilya’s Arthashastra outlines the importance of ethics in governance and offers solutions to curb corruption.

Moral Dilemmas of Public Personnel

Public personnel face ethical challenges when personal values conflict with their duties to the public and government policies.

Common Moral Dilemmas

• Conflict of Interest: A public official might have to choose between serving public interest and benefiting personally. For example, if a government worker owns shares in a company being regulated, they might be torn between making a decision that benefits their finances or the public.
• Whistleblowing: A public servant may need to decide whether to expose corruption within their organization, risking their career and relationships. For example, an employee discovering financial misconduct might struggle with loyalty to colleagues versus ethical responsibility to report it.
• Public vs. Private Ethics: Personal beliefs may conflict with public duties. For instance, a healthcare official might be required to enforce policies that they personally disagree with, like restricting access to certain treatments.
• Resource Allocation: Deciding how to distribute limited government resources, like healthcare or education funding, can be difficult. Allocating resources to one group may disadvantage others, causing ethical tension.

These dilemmas show the tough decisions public personnel must make when their ethical responsibilities conflict with personal values or external pressures.