- The article discusses the Supreme Court’s scrutiny of the Tamil Nadu Governor’s actions, highlighting concerns over gubernatorial overreach.
- Emphasizes the need to reassess the Governor’s role in India’s federal structure.
Key Constitutional Functions of the Governor
- Executive Head of the State
- Functions as the nominal authority and agent of the central government.
- Executes state government actions in the Governor’s name (Article 154).
- Appoints the Chief Minister and, on their advice, the Council of Ministers.
- Legislative Role and Assent to Bills
- Summons, prorogues, and dissolves the state assembly (Article 174).
- Must give assent for a Bill to become law; can reserve Bills for the President’s consideration (Article 200).
- Plays a crucial role in state financial governance (Article 207).
- Discretionary Powers
- Can recommend President’s Rule under Article 356 or invite a party to form the government in hung assemblies.
- Role in Appointments and Administration
- Appoints key officials like the Advocate General and members of the State Public Service Commission (Articles 165 and 316).
- Judicial Powers
- Holds pardoning powers under Article 161, with limitations compared to the President.
- Special Responsibilities for Scheduled Areas
- Has special powers over Scheduled Areas and tribal welfare in certain states.
Key Concerns Related to the Office of Governor
- Delay in Granting Assent to Bills
- Increasingly withholds or delays assent, undermining legislative processes.
- Example: In Punjab, assent was withheld for two years.
- Partisan Conduct
- Often acts in alignment with the ruling party at the Union level, raising concerns of political bias.
- Example: Actions in Arunachal Pradesh led to the dismissal of the elected government.
- Misuse of Discretionary Powers
- Arbitrary decisions when inviting parties to form governments, leading to political bias.
- Example: Karnataka’s 2018 government formation controversy.
- Conflict Over University Appointments
- Interference in appointments of Vice-Chancellors, leading to legal disputes with state governments.
- Lack of Accountability
- Accountable only to the President, lacking direct consequences for actions.
- Overreach in Administrative Matters
- Interferes in day-to-day governance, leading to paralysis.
- Example: Clashes between the Lieutenant Governor and the state government in Delhi.
- Arbitrary Use of President’s Rule
- Historically instrumental in invoking Article 356, often on dubious grounds.
Suggested Reforms to Enhance the Role of Governor
- Defining Time Limits for Decisions on Bills
- Governors should act within a fixed timeframe to prevent legislative paralysis.
- Limiting Discretionary Powers
- Clear guidelines for inviting parties to form governments to prevent partisan bias.
- Ensuring Neutrality in University Appointments
- Reassess Governors’ roles in universities; states should have a greater say.
- Revising Appointment and Removal Processes
- More transparent appointment processes to ensure independence.
- Accountability Through Judicial Review
- Actions should be subject to judicial scrutiny to prevent unconstitutional conduct.
- Clear Guidelines on Imposing President’s Rule
- Stricter safeguards against arbitrary dismissal of elected governments.
- Creating an Impeachment Process
- Introduce an impeachment process for Governors similar to that of the President.
Way Forward
- The Governor’s role is vital but increasingly contentious due to delays, political bias, and overreach.
- Emphasizes the need for reforms to uphold constitutional principles and democratic norms.