Examine how the Indian model of secularism—which differs from the concept of secularism in the West—was shaped by the Constitution. Examine the arguments and difficulties related to putting this philosophy into practice.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Constitution of India plays a crucial role in shaping the Indian model of secularism, which is distinct from the Western notion of secularism. The Indian Constitution guarantees religious freedom to all its citizens and ensures the state does not discriminate against any individual or community on the basis of religion. This idea of secularism in India is often referred to as “principled distance” – where the state maintains equal distance from all religions and treats all citizens equally regardless of their religious beliefs.
One of the key aspects of the Indian model of secularism is the idea of “positive secularism,” which involves the state actively promoting religious harmony and understanding among different communities. This is reflected in the Constitution through provisions like Article 25, which guarantees individuals the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate their religion. Additionally, the state is mandated to intervene in religious matters to ensure social reform and equality among citizens.
However, the implementation of secularism in India has been a subject of debate and challenge. One of the major challenges is the issue of religious identity politics, where politicians and political parties use religious rhetoric to mobilize voters along religious lines. This has led to communal tensions and conflicts in the country, undermining the principles of secularism.
Another challenge is the issue of state intervention in religious matters, where the government’s policies and actions have sometimes been seen as favoring or discriminating against certain religious groups. This has led to accusations of appeasement and bias, further complicating the implementation of secularism in India.
Furthermore, the rise of religious fundamentalism and extremism poses a threat to the secular fabric of Indian society. Instances of communal violence and religious discrimination have highlighted the need for a more robust implementation of secularism to protect the rights and freedoms of all citizens.
In conclusion, the Indian model of secularism, as enshrined in the Constitution, is distinct from the Western notion of secularism and places a strong emphasis on religious harmony and equality among citizens. However, challenges and debates surrounding its implementation persist, requiring continuous efforts to uphold the principles of secularism and ensure religious freedom for all.