How can we understand the phenomenon of artists, writers, and musicians, such as Van Gogh, Dickinson, and Kafka, being underrecognized during their lifetimes?
riaBegginer
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
India’s Disaster Management
The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...
The phenomenon of underappreciated artists, writers and musicians during their lifetimes like Van Gogh, Dickinson, or Kafka can be understood by several factors.
Being Ahead of Their Time: Many of these artists produced works that were innovative and ahead of time in terms of culture and aesthetics. It is possible that their peers could not stand this unique style, approach to work or themes they chose. For example, it was only later that the art world fully recognized the import of Van Gogh’s bold usage of color as well as emotional intensity in his paintings.
Restricted reach and exposure: Such artists had limited channels for disseminating information about their works during their lifetimes. For instance Emily Dickinson only published few poems while alive and lived a secluded life which limited her audience.
Personal Circumstances: Personal hardships and mental problems also contributed to this situation. Many artists were faced with financial constraints, suffered from mental illness or societal pressure made it difficult for many to self-promote as an artist. For instance Franz Kafka had self-doubt such that he wanted all unpublished manuscripts burnt on his demise.
The phenomenon of underappreciated artists, writers and musicians during their lifetimes like Van Gogh, Dickinson, or Kafka can be understood by several factors.
Being Ahead of Their Time: Many of these artists produced works that were innovative and ahead of time in terms of culture and aesthetics. It is possible that their peers could not stand this unique style, approach to work or themes they chose. For example, it was only later that the art world fully recognized the import of Van Gogh’s bold usage of color as well as emotional intensity in his paintings.
Restricted reach and exposure: Such artists had limited channels for disseminating information about their works during their lifetimes. For instance Emily Dickinson only published few poems while alive and lived a secluded life which limited her audience.
Personal Circumstances: Personal hardships and mental problems also contributed to this situation. Many artists were faced with financial constraints, suffered from mental illness or societal pressure made it difficult for many to self-promote as an artist. For instance Franz Kafka had self-doubt such that he wanted all unpublished manuscripts burnt on his demise.
The phenomenon of underappreciated artists, writers and musicians during their lifetimes like Van Gogh, Dickinson, or Kafka can be understood by several factors.
Being Ahead of Their Time: Many of these artists produced works that were innovative and ahead of time in terms of culture and aesthetics. It is possible that their peers could not stand this unique style, approach to work or themes they chose. For example, it was only later that the art world fully recognized the import of Van Gogh’s bold usage of color as well as emotional intensity in his paintings.
Restricted reach and exposure: Such artists had limited channels for disseminating information about their works during their lifetimes. For instance Emily Dickinson only published few poems while alive and lived a secluded life which limited her audience.
Personal Circumstances: Personal hardships and mental problems also contributed to this situation. Many artists were faced with financial constraints, suffered from mental illness or societal pressure made it difficult for many to self-promote as an artist. For instance Franz Kafka had self-doubt such that he wanted all unpublished manuscripts burnt on his demise.
The phenomenon of underappreciated artists, writers and musicians during their lifetimes like Van Gogh, Dickinson, or Kafka can be understood by several factors.
Being Ahead of Their Time: Many of these artists produced works that were innovative and ahead of time in terms of culture and aesthetics. It is possible that their peers could not stand this unique style, approach to work or themes they chose. For example, it was only later that the art world fully recognized the import of Van Gogh’s bold usage of color as well as emotional intensity in his paintings.
Restricted reach and exposure: Such artists had limited channels for disseminating information about their works during their lifetimes. For instance Emily Dickinson only published few poems while alive and lived a secluded life which limited her audience.
Personal Circumstances: Personal hardships and mental problems also contributed to this situation. Many artists were faced with financial constraints, suffered from mental illness or societal pressure made it difficult for many to self-promote as an artist. For instance Franz Kafka had self-doubt such that he wanted all unpublished manuscripts burnt on his demise.
The phenomenon of underappreciated artists, writers and musicians during their lifetimes like Van Gogh, Dickinson, or Kafka can be understood by several factors.
Being Ahead of Their Time: Many of these artists produced works that were innovative and ahead of time in terms of culture and aesthetics. It is possible that their peers could not stand this unique style, approach to work or themes they chose. For example, it was only later that the art world fully recognized the import of Van Gogh’s bold usage of color as well as emotional intensity in his paintings.
Restricted reach and exposure: Such artists had limited channels for disseminating information about their works during their lifetimes. For instance Emily Dickinson only published few poems while alive and lived a secluded life which limited her audience.
Personal Circumstances: Personal hardships and mental problems also contributed to this situation. Many artists were faced with financial constraints, suffered from mental illness or societal pressure made it difficult for many to self-promote as an artist. For instance Franz Kafka had self-doubt such that he wanted all unpublished manuscripts burnt on his demise.
Although there simply can’t be a single answer as one has to keep in mind that the phenomenon has both cultural, critical and behavioral context.
The simplest answer could be the repetitive behavioral pattern of intelligentsia and artistic landscape which always recognizes artistic genius of an artist after their death. This issue has been discussed time and time again by critics/poets such as T.S. Eliot who in his critically acclaimed essay “Tradition and Individual Talent” talks briefly of this phenomenon of always considering the “masters” (poets hailing from previous literary ages) on pedestal while continuing to undermine the contemporary talent. As he even doesn’t shy away from criticizing the canonized “masters”.
On the other hand, the logical answer to this question could be the visionary nature of the artists’ work. Both Van Gogh and Kafka were somewhat ahead of their peers. Speaking specifically of Van Gogh he is considered as one of the pioneers of the post-impressionist movement which defied codes of the prevalent impressionist movement. That is why he was even named as primary influence by artists like Gauguin who were also celebrated after their death. Putting the same logic, one could see where Kafka’s work was somewhat opposite to his celebrated peers even avant garde artists were somewhat revolving around the violence of World War I. Kafka was an absurdist that put the human condition in its center looking from the absurdist lens (the absurdist movement itself gained prominence during the 1940s with people like Camus and Beckett gaining critical acclaim, kafka being dead 20 years before the movement).
Artists like Vincent Van Gogh, Emily Dickinson, and Franz Kafka were not famous during their lifetimes for several reasons. First, their work was often ahead of its time. Van Gogh’s bold colors and emotional brushstrokes did not match the 19th-century taste. Kafka’s strange and dark stories puzzled his contemporaries. Dickinson’s poetry was unconventional and rarely published.
Personal issues also played a role. Many of these artists were introverted or reclusive. Dickinson stayed at home and avoided socializing. Kafka was shy and unsure about his writing. Van Gogh struggled with mental health problems. These traits kept them from promoting their work.
Money was another problem. Van Gogh lived in poverty and depended on his brother. Without funds, he couldn’t gain exposure. Dickinson and Kafka had limited means, too, making it hard to reach an audience.
The world of art and literature also had its challenges. It favored familiar styles and often ignored new ideas. Van Gogh’s art was too different, and Kafka’s themes too dark.
Finally, there were no modern ways to share their work widely. Their work of art was recognized only after their deaths, when critics and scholars reassessed their contributions. This delayed fame shows how artistic value can take time to be appreciated.
Artists like Vincent Van Gogh, Emily Dickinson, and Franz Kafka were not famous during their lifetimes for several reasons. First, their work was often ahead of its time. Van Gogh’s bold colors and emotional brushstrokes did not match the 19th-century taste. Kafka’s strange and dark stories puzzled his contemporaries. Dickinson’s poetry was unconventional and rarely published.
Personal issues also played a role. Many of these artists were introverted or reclusive. Dickinson stayed at home and avoided socializing. Kafka was shy and unsure about his writing. Van Gogh struggled with mental health problems. These traits kept them from promoting their work.
Money was another problem. Van Gogh lived in poverty and depended on his brother. Without funds, he couldn’t gain exposure. Dickinson and Kafka had limited means, too, making it hard to reach an audience.
The world of art and literature also had its challenges. It favored familiar styles and often ignored new ideas. Van Gogh’s art was too different, and Kafka’s themes too dark.
Finally, there were no modern ways to share their work widely. Their work of art was recognized only after their deaths, when critics and scholars reassessed their contributions. This delayed fame shows how artistic value can take time to be appreciated.