Preventive detention laws should indeed be used more judiciously to balance security concerns with individual freedoms. These laws, designed to prevent individuals from committing potential crimes, can easily be misused, leading to violations of constitutional rights such as personal liberty and due process. Over-reliance on preventive detention can result in the arbitrary detention of individuals without sufficient evidence, undermining the rule of law and public trust in the justice system. Therefore, it is essential to apply these laws with caution and only in cases where there is a clear, imminent threat to public safety.

To ensure the proper implementation of preventive detention laws in accordance with constitutional principles, several measures can be adopted. First, stringent judicial oversight is crucial, with courts regularly reviewing detention cases to prevent misuse. Establishing clear guidelines and standards for detention, including specific criteria for what constitutes an imminent threat, can help minimize arbitrary use. Additionally, ensuring detainees have access to legal representation and the right to appeal their detention can protect their rights. Transparency in the implementation of these laws, along with regular audits and public reporting, can further enhance accountability and adherence to constitutional norms.