India's constitutional reservation system, designed to uplift historically marginalized communities like Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), profoundly impacts the political landscape and social dynamics. Politically, it has led to the rise of caste-basRead more
India’s constitutional reservation system, designed to uplift historically marginalized communities like Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), profoundly impacts the political landscape and social dynamics. Politically, it has led to the rise of caste-based parties and leaders who advocate for the rights of these groups. This system has shifted political power from dominant castes to those previously marginalized, fostering greater representation in legislatures and public offices.
Socially, the reservation system has facilitated increased access to education, employment, and political participation for disadvantaged communities, contributing to their socioeconomic advancement. However, it has also sparked debates and tensions among different caste groups, particularly concerning the perceived fairness and effectiveness of the system. Some argue that reservations perpetuate caste identities and social divisions, while others see them as essential for achieving true equality in a deeply stratified society.
The system’s impact is dual-edged: while it has empowered millions and helped address historical injustices, it has also led to competitive caste politics and sometimes exacerbated social tensions, reflecting the complex interplay between affirmative action and societal harmony.
See less
The changes which have been introduced in the Indian Constitution in the recent past have shifted the balance of federal landscape and administration further to the Centre. For example, the Centre abrogated Article 370 in August 2019 and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, whichRead more
The changes which have been introduced in the Indian Constitution in the recent past have shifted the balance of federal landscape and administration further to the Centre. For example, the Centre abrogated Article 370 in August 2019 and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, which made most of the state’s autonomy nugatory, reporting directly to New Delhi. This was a particularly clear sign of a more active and dominant policy on the part of the central government in relation to the states, especially in matters of a federal character. For instance, while the 101st amendment in 2017 has integrated GST, it has necessitated the centralisation of tax collections. While this aided in the process of tax simplification it restricted the autonomy of the states on fiscal policy and made them more dependent on central grants. These changes have impacted local governance by reducing the ability and capacity of the state government to tackle issues that are local or peculiar to any region. Battles over centralization of power occurred concerning the loss of control over the economy and the management of specific regions, and the consequences of this for variation and autonomy of states. In this regard the change has generated questions on the efficiency of regional governance structures and capacity of states to address population needs where there is no adequate decentralization.
See less