Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Post-independence India

Share
Followers
57 Answers
295 Questions
Home/Post-independence India/Page 14

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Yash Patel
  • 1
Yash PatelBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In: , , , , ,
  • 1

  1. Bhargavi Saraf
    Bhargavi Saraf Begginer
    This answer was edited.

    Prime Minister Modi's decision to skip the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) meet in Kazakhstan can be seen as a strategic move reflecting the current state of India-China relations post the 2020 Eastern Ladakh issue. Firstly, the Eastern Ladakh standoff marked a significant deterioration in bRead more

    Prime Minister Modi’s decision to skip the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) meet in Kazakhstan can be seen as a strategic move reflecting the current state of India-China relations post the 2020 Eastern Ladakh issue.

    Firstly, the Eastern Ladakh standoff marked a significant deterioration in bilateral relations between India and China, characterized by border clashes and heightened military tensions. The aftermath saw both countries deploying troops in large numbers along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), leading to casualties and a deepening of mistrust.

    Secondly, by skipping the SCO summit, Modi may be signaling India’s stance on maintaining a cautious and assertive posture towards China. This move could be interpreted as a diplomatic signal that bilateral issues, particularly those concerning border security and territorial integrity, remain unresolved and require careful handling.

    Thirdly, India’s absence from the SCO summit could indicate a shift towards strengthening alliances and partnerships outside the SCO framework, possibly with countries sharing similar concerns regarding China’s assertiveness in the region.

    Overall, Modi’s decision reflects India’s evolving foreign policy strategy post the Eastern Ladakh conflict, emphasizing the importance of addressing bilateral issues firmly while recalibrating its regional and global engagements.

    See less
Janani K
  • 0
Poll
Janani KBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: , , , , , ,
  • 0

  1. Shreya Smita
    Shreya Smita Begginer

    Meetings between India's Prime Minister Modi and Russia's President Putin might help with global issues, but they don’t directly stop wars. Their talks could make a difference, but ending conflicts usually needs cooperation from many countries and efforts beyond just one meeting.

    Meetings between India’s Prime Minister Modi and Russia’s President Putin might help with global issues, but they don’t directly stop wars. Their talks could make a difference, but ending conflicts usually needs cooperation from many countries and efforts beyond just one meeting.

    See less
ALISHA SAGAR
  • 0
ALISHA SAGARBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: , ,
  • 0

diplomacyinternational relations
  1. Sreeja depa
    Sreeja depa Begginer

    To make peace in global conflicts, the world needs better international diplomacy. This means talking more and finding ways to understand each other. One way to do this is by having neutral countries help conflicting parties talk things out. International groups like the United Nations (UN) can alsoRead more

    To make peace in global conflicts, the world needs better international diplomacy. This means talking more and finding ways to understand each other. One way to do this is by having neutral countries help conflicting parties talk things out. International groups like the United Nations (UN) can also greatly help. They can organize peace talks, send peacekeepers to stop any fighting, and help everyone follow global rules.

    Soft power, like sharing culture or offering economic benefits, can also convince countries to solve problems peacefully. If countries see they can gain from peace, they might be more willing to talk. Understanding each other’s cultures can make countries more sympathetic towards each other.

    But it’s not just about stopping fights; it’s also about fixing what caused them, like bad economies, unfair politics, or social issues. International diplomacy should help countries make these significant changes for lasting peace.

    In short, by talking more, using international help, and fixing deep problems, diplomacy can be stronger and make the world more peaceful.

    See less
Meghalina Chakraborty
  • 1
Meghalina ChakrabortyLearner
Asked: July 20, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

Analyze the challenges India faces in balancing its desire for strategic autonomy with the need for global cooperation on issues like climate change, trade, and terrorism.

developmentforeign policyglobal leaderindiainternational relations
  1. utteja shree
    utteja shree Begginer

    As India's role in the global order grows, it faces several challenges and opportunities in balancing its strategic autonomy with global cooperation. Challenges: 1. Climate Change: India needs to balance economic growth with reducing carbon emissions. This is hard because India relies on coal for enRead more

    As India’s role in the global order grows, it faces several challenges and opportunities in balancing its strategic autonomy with global cooperation.

    Challenges:

    1. Climate Change: India needs to balance economic growth with reducing carbon emissions. This is hard because India relies on coal for energy, which conflicts with global climate goals.

    2. Trade Policies: Protecting local industries while participating in global trade is tricky. India’s trade policies sometimes clash with international free trade standards.

    3. Terrorism: India must work with other countries to combat terrorism. Sharing intelligence and resources is essential, but India also needs to maintain its security independence.

     Opportunities:

    1. Global Leadership: India can lead on issues like climate change and sustainable development, influencing global policies while protecting its interests.

    2. Economic Growth: Engaging in global trade and investment can boost India’s economy, creating jobs and driving innovation.

    3. Diplomatic Influence: By strengthening ties with various countries, India can enhance its diplomatic influence and navigate complex international relations.

    In summary, India must balance its desire for strategic autonomy with the need for global cooperation by leveraging its growing influence, participating actively in international forums, and implementing smart domestic policies.

    See less
MEHNAAZ HAWA
  • 0
MEHNAAZ HAWABegginer
Asked: July 21, 2024In: , , , , , , , ,
  • 0

Elaborate on the comparison between Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and Foreign Exchange Management Act.  What are the major differences between the two Acts and suggest changes, if any, that are required.

femaferaforeign exchangeforeign lawsinternational financesmanagement of foreign exchangeregulation of foreign income
  1. Ritika Sharma.1
    Ritika Sharma.1 Begginer

    Here are some major differences between the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and the Foreign Exchange Management Act: FERA and FEMA manage India's foreign currency and payments differently. In 1973, the Indian Parliament passed FERA, which took effect on January 1, 1974, to manage and save foreign cuRead more

    Here are some major differences between the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and the Foreign Exchange Management Act:

    1. FERA and FEMA manage India’s foreign currency and payments differently. In 1973, the Indian Parliament passed FERA, which took effect on January 1, 1974, to manage and save foreign currency at a time of low reserves. FEMA replaced the restricted FERA framework on June 1, 2000, after Parliament authorized it in 1999 to facilitate orderly foreign currency management.
    2. FERA’s rigorous restrictions reflected the economy and focused on foreign currency management and conservation. A complex 81-section law defined “Authorized persons” carefully and based residence status on citizenship. FERA violations were criminal crimes that carried the possibility of jail and barred legal representation. In addition, infractions were non-compoundable and could not be addressed outside of court.
    3. However, FEMA’s free and flexible regulation reflected India’s 1990s liberalization ambitions. With just 49 parts, FEMA’s structure is simpler and defines “Authorized persons,” including banks. The past six months of presence in India determines FEMA resident status, not citizenship. FEMA violations are civil infractions punishable by fines, but failure to pay may lead to incarceration. In contrast to FERA, breaches may be settled and the accused can be represented. FEMA added specific directors and courts to streamline appeals compared to FERA Supreme Court appeals.
    4. FERA’s cautious approach needed RBI approval for FX transactions, limiting operational flexibility. This regulation was repealed by FEMA, making currency transactions easier. FEMA also included information technology requirements to support a modernizing economy, unlike FERA. FERA to FEMA represents India’s transformation from a controlled to a liberalized and growth-oriented economy.
    See less
Kriti Agarwal
  • 0
Kriti AgarwalBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the fundamental concepts and aims that shaped India’s foreign policy in the early decades after independence.

upsc: foreign policy of independent india
  1. Eisha Trivedi
    Eisha Trivedi Begginer

    In the first decades after independence, India's foreign policy was shaped by a combination of historical experiences, ideological commitments, and strategic considerations. Here’s an analysis of the key principles and objectives that guided India's foreign policy in this period: 1. Non-Alignment PrRead more

    In the first decades after independence, India’s foreign policy was shaped by a combination of historical experiences, ideological commitments, and strategic considerations. Here’s an analysis of the key principles and objectives that guided India’s foreign policy in this period:

    1. Non-Alignment
    Principle:

    Avoidance of Bloc Politics: India adopted a policy of non-alignment, which was aimed at avoiding alignment with either of the two major blocs during the Cold War—the Western bloc led by the United States and the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. The policy sought to maintain independence in international relations and avoid entanglement in superpower rivalries.
    Objectives:

    Sovereign Decision-Making: By staying non-aligned, India aimed to make its own foreign policy decisions without being influenced or pressured by the superpowers.
    Promotion of Peace and Security: Non-alignment was also intended to promote global peace and security by avoiding alliances that could lead to increased tensions or conflicts.
    2. Anti-Colonialism and Support for National Liberation Movements
    Principle:

    Opposition to Colonialism: India’s foreign policy was strongly influenced by its own struggle for independence. The Indian government supported the decolonization process and opposed colonial and imperialist practices globally.
    Objectives:

    Support for Independence Movements: India supported various national liberation movements across Asia and Africa, including in countries like Algeria, Vietnam, and Indonesia.
    Building Solidarity: India aimed to build solidarity among newly independent nations and support their right to self-determination and sovereignty.
    3. Peaceful Coexistence
    Principle:

    Diplomatic Engagement: India’s foreign policy emphasized the principle of peaceful coexistence, which was part of its broader non-alignment strategy. This principle was about maintaining peaceful relations with all countries, regardless of ideological differences.
    Objectives:

    Stability and Harmony: India sought to foster stability and harmonious relations with neighboring countries and beyond. This was particularly important in a region with several complex historical and geopolitical issues.
    Conflict Resolution: India aimed to resolve disputes through diplomatic means rather than through conflict, reflecting its commitment to peaceful coexistence.
    4. Development and Economic Cooperation
    Principle:

    Economic Development: India’s foreign policy sought to address developmental needs through economic cooperation and assistance. The country was focused on using its foreign policy to promote economic growth and development.
    Objectives:

    International Aid and Assistance: India engaged in providing technical and economic assistance to other developing countries, which was part of its strategy to build alliances and foster mutual economic growth.
    Economic Partnerships: India sought to establish economic partnerships and trade relations that could support its own development goals and contribute to regional economic integration.
    5. Regional Security and Cooperation
    Principle:

    Regional Focus: India’s foreign policy also focused on regional security and cooperation, reflecting its geographical and strategic concerns.
    Objectives:

    Conflict Prevention: India worked to prevent conflicts and promote stability in its immediate neighborhood, including through engagements with neighboring countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and China.
    Bilateral Relations: India sought to develop bilateral relations with its neighbors to address mutual concerns and interests, such as border disputes and trade relations.
    6. Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity
    Principle:

    Defending Sovereignty: Maintaining sovereignty and territorial integrity was a key principle guiding India’s foreign policy, especially given the challenges and conflicts over borders with neighboring countries.
    Objectives:

    Resolving Border Disputes: India aimed to resolve border disputes through negotiations and diplomatic channels, although some disputes, such as those with China and Pakistan, continued to be contentious.
    National Security: Ensuring national security and protecting territorial integrity were central to India’s foreign policy, including during the Indo-China War (1962) and the Indo-Pakistani Wars (1965 and 1971).
    7. Global Diplomacy and Institutional Participation
    Principle:

    Active Diplomacy: India engaged actively in international diplomacy and participated in various global and regional organizations to promote its interests and values.
    Objectives:

    United Nations Engagement: India was an active participant in the United Nations and its various agencies, advocating for issues such as disarmament, development, and the rights of developing countries.
    International Institutions: India sought to influence and participate in international institutions to shape global policies and contribute to international governance.

    See less
Nishi Desai
  • 0
Nishi DesaiBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 0

Consider the successes and limitations of India’s efforts to establish itself as a prominent voice in the developing world.

upsc: foreign policy of independent india
  1. Eisha Trivedi
    Eisha Trivedi Begginer

    India has strived to establish itself as a leading voice for the developing world since gaining independence in 1947. This effort has been characterized by a combination of diplomatic initiatives, economic strategies, and participation in international organizations. Here’s an evaluation of the succRead more

    India has strived to establish itself as a leading voice for the developing world since gaining independence in 1947. This effort has been characterized by a combination of diplomatic initiatives, economic strategies, and participation in international organizations. Here’s an evaluation of the successes and limitations of these efforts:

    Successes
    Leadership in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)

    Formation and Advocacy: India was a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1961, which aimed to provide a collective voice for newly independent and developing countries that sought to remain independent of the superpower rivalries of the Cold War.
    Influence: India’s leadership in NAM helped to shape the discourse around decolonization, self-determination, and peaceful coexistence, establishing India as a key advocate for the interests of developing nations.
    Support for Anti-Colonial and Liberation Movements

    Global Solidarity: India actively supported anti-colonial and liberation movements across Asia and Africa. By providing moral and sometimes material support, India enhanced its reputation as a champion of self-determination and justice.
    Diplomatic Influence: This support solidified India’s role in international diplomacy as a leader in advocating for the rights of oppressed and colonized peoples.
    Economic Cooperation and Development Initiatives

    Technical Assistance: India has provided technical and economic assistance to various developing countries through bilateral and multilateral programs. Initiatives like the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC) program have facilitated capacity-building and skills development in many countries.
    Development Partnerships: India has engaged in South-South cooperation, sharing its development experiences and practices with other developing nations, which has been well-received and has bolstered its leadership status.
    Active Role in Global Institutions

    United Nations: India has been an active participant in the United Nations, including its various specialized agencies. It has used its platform to advocate for global governance reforms and for the interests of developing countries.
    World Trade Organization (WTO): India has played a significant role in WTO negotiations, particularly in defending the interests of developing nations in global trade discussions.
    Influence in Regional and Global Forums

    BRICS: As a member of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), India has engaged in high-level dialogues with other major emerging economies, amplifying its voice in global economic and political discussions.
    G20: India’s participation in the G20 has allowed it to contribute to global economic policymaking and advocate for the interests of developing countries within a group of major economies.
    Limitations
    Challenges in Balancing Domestic and Global Priorities

    Domestic Issues: India’s domestic challenges, including poverty, inequality, and infrastructure constraints, sometimes limit its ability to project power and influence globally. The need to address domestic issues can occasionally overshadow its international ambitions.
    Policy Inconsistencies: Balancing domestic priorities with global advocacy has sometimes led to inconsistencies in foreign policy positions, which can affect India’s credibility as a leader of the developing world.
    Geopolitical Constraints

    Regional Conflicts: India’s geopolitical conflicts, particularly with neighboring countries like Pakistan and China, have at times distracted from its efforts to lead on global issues. These conflicts can also complicate India’s diplomatic relationships and limit its influence.
    Limited Military Power: Compared to some global powers, India’s military capabilities are limited, which affects its ability to assert influence in global security matters.
    Economic Limitations

    Economic Disparities: Despite significant economic growth, India still faces substantial economic disparities and development challenges, which can undermine its ability to lead effectively on global economic issues.
    Trade Imbalances: India’s economic policies and trade practices have occasionally been criticized by other developing countries, impacting its role as a champion of global economic justice.
    Institutional Constraints

    UN Security Council: India’s quest for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council has faced resistance from established powers and has not yet been realized. This limitation affects its ability to influence global security decisions directly.
    International Influence: Despite active participation in various international forums, India has sometimes struggled to translate its economic and diplomatic efforts into substantial influence over global decision-making processes.
    Perception and Influence

    Regional Influence: India’s influence in its immediate neighborhood is mixed, with varying degrees of success in fostering regional cooperation and addressing cross-border issues.
    Global Perception: India’s role as a leader of the developing world can sometimes be overshadowed by perceptions of its own emerging economy status and complex domestic issues, which can affect its global influence.

    See less
Nishi Desai
  • 1
Nishi DesaiBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Discuss the elements that influenced India’s reaction to the establishment of Bangladesh and its eventual recognition.

upsc: foreign policy of independent india
  1. Hareem Khan
    Hareem Khan Begginer

    India's response to the creation of Bangladesh and its subsequent recognition was shaped by a complex array of factors. Here are some of the key factors that influenced India's response: Historical ties: India and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) had historical ties, dating back to the days of BritishRead more

    India’s response to the creation of Bangladesh and its subsequent recognition was shaped by a complex array of factors. Here are some of the key factors that influenced India’s response:

    1. Historical ties: India and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) had historical ties, dating back to the days of British colonial rule. India saw itself as a natural protector of the Bengali people, who had been oppressed by the Pakistani government.
    2. Communal considerations: India’s response was also influenced by communal considerations. The majority of Bangladesh’s population is Muslim, and India saw the creation of Bangladesh as an opportunity to strengthen its ties with the Muslim world.
    3. Strategic interests: India’s strategic interests in the region played a significant role in shaping its response. India saw the creation of Bangladesh as a means to weaken Pakistan’s military and economic power, which had been a major threat to India.
    4. International pressure: India faced international pressure to recognize Bangladesh, particularly from the United States, which had been a major supporter of the Pakistani military regime.
    5. Internal politics: India’s internal politics also played a significant role in shaping its response. The Indian government was under pressure from various political parties and interest groups to support the Bengali people and recognize Bangladesh.
    6. Economic considerations: India also considered economic factors, such as the potential benefits of trade and economic cooperation with Bangladesh.
    7. Diplomatic efforts: India’s diplomatic efforts were crucial in shaping its response. Indian diplomats worked tirelessly to build relationships with key international players, including the United States, the Soviet Union, and China.
    8. Military considerations: India’s military considerations were also important. India had a significant military presence in the region, and it wanted to ensure that its security interests were protected.

    In terms of recognition, India recognized Bangladesh on December 6, 1971, just days after the creation of Bangladesh. The recognition was announced by Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who hailed the creation of Bangladesh as a “triumph” for the Indian nation.

    The recognition of Bangladesh was a significant turning point in Indo-Bangladesh relations, marking the beginning of a new era of cooperation and friendship between the two nations. Since then, India and Bangladesh have enjoyed close ties, with cooperation in areas such as trade, security, and culture.

    See less
Nishi Desai
  • 1
Nishi DesaiBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Examine the role of India’s nuclear program in its foreign policy calculations, as well as the worldwide response to it.

upsc: foreign policy of independent india
  1. Kanhiya Lal
    Kanhiya Lal Begginer

    India's nuclear program has played a significant role in its foreign policy calculations and has elicited various responses from the global community. Role in foreign policy calculations: Deterrence: India's nuclear program has been driven by the desire to achieve deterrence against potential adversRead more

    India’s nuclear program has played a significant role in its foreign policy calculations and has elicited various responses from the global community.

    Role in foreign policy calculations:

    1. Deterrence: India’s nuclear program has been driven by the desire to achieve deterrence against potential adversaries, particularly Pakistan and China.
    2. National security: India has viewed its nuclear program as a means to ensure national security and prevent the threat of nuclear attack from neighboring countries.
    3. Regional influence: India’s nuclear program has been seen as a way to assert its influence in the region and to counterbalance the growing military power of China.
    4. International recognition: India’s nuclear program has been a key factor in its quest for international recognition as a major world power.

    Global responses:

    1. Nuclear non-proliferation efforts: India’s nuclear program has been criticized by the global community for its perceived disregard for international non-proliferation norms.
    2. Security concerns: Many countries have expressed concerns about the security implications of India’s nuclear program, particularly with regard to the potential risks of nuclear conflict in the region.
    3. Economic sanctions: The United States and other countries have imposed economic sanctions on India in response to its nuclear tests, including restrictions on trade and technology transfers.
    4. Strategic partnerships: India has sought to mitigate these concerns by forging strategic partnerships with countries like the United States, Russia, and France, which have provided diplomatic and economic support.

    Key developments:

    1. Nuclear tests: India conducted a series of nuclear tests in 1998, which were widely condemned by the international community.
    2. Civilian nuclear agreement: In 2008, India signed a civilian nuclear agreement with the United States, which provided for increased cooperation in civilian nuclear energy and helped to ease some of the sanctions.
    3. Nuclear doctrine: India’s nuclear doctrine has evolved over time, with a shift towards a more nuanced approach that emphasizes deterrence and minimum credible deterrence rather than a first-strike capability.
    4. International engagement: India has increasingly engaged with international institutions and organizations on issues related to disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control.
    See less
Nishi Desai
  • 1
Nishi DesaiBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Discuss the difficulties and opportunities posed by India’s ‘Look East’ and ‘Act East’ initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region.

upsc: foreign policy of independent india
  1. Kanhiya Lal
    Kanhiya Lal Begginer

    India's "Look East" policy, initiated in the 1990s, aimed to strengthen economic and strategic ties with Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific region. The policy has evolved over time, and in 2014, the Indian government launched the "Act East" policy, which aims to convert India's economic andRead more

    India’s “Look East” policy, initiated in the 1990s, aimed to strengthen economic and strategic ties with Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific region. The policy has evolved over time, and in 2014, the Indian government launched the “Act East” policy, which aims to convert India’s economic and strategic ties with the region into tangible benefits. The “Act East” policy has presented both challenges and opportunities for India in the Asia-Pacific region.

    Challenges:

    1. Geopolitical tensions: India’s growing ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and other regional organizations have created concerns among some countries, including China, which sees India’s rise as a threat to its regional influence.
    2. Competition for resources: India’s increased engagement with the region may lead to competition for resources, particularly energy and natural resources, which could create tensions with other countries.
    3. Infrastructure challenges: India’s infrastructure in the region is limited, which can make it difficult to maintain a strong presence and respond to emergencies.
    4. Cultural and linguistic differences: India’s cultural and linguistic differences with the region may create challenges in communication and understanding, particularly in areas such as trade and investment.
    5. Regional rivalries: India’s involvement in regional organizations such as ASEAN may lead to involvement in regional rivalries, particularly between China and the United States.

    Opportunities:

    1. Economic growth: India’s “Act East” policy has the potential to boost economic growth by increasing trade and investment with the region.
    2. Strategic partnerships: India’s partnerships with countries such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia can provide a counterbalance to China’s growing influence in the region.
    3. Security cooperation: India’s security cooperation with countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines can help address regional security concerns, including terrorism and piracy.
    4. Cultural exchange: India’s “Act East” policy can facilitate cultural exchange between India and the region, which can help promote people-to-people ties and understanding.
    5. Regional leadership: India’s growing involvement in regional organizations such as ASEAN can help establish it as a leader in the region and increase its influence on regional issues.

    Strategies for success:

    1. Enhance infrastructure: India needs to invest in upgrading its infrastructure in the region to improve connectivity and trade facilitation.
    2. Develop people-to-people ties: India needs to focus on developing people-to-people ties through cultural exchange programs, educational institutions, and tourism.
    3. Strengthen strategic partnerships: India needs to strengthen its strategic partnerships with countries in the region through joint military exercises, defense cooperation, and security dialogues.
    4. Promote trade and investment: India needs to promote trade and investment with the region through initiatives such as free trade agreements and investment promotion programs.
    5. Engage in regional organizations: India needs to engage actively in regional organizations such as ASEAN to promote its interests and increase its influence in the region.
    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: March 12, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (12 March 2025)

What are Development Financial Institutions (DFIs)? Discuss the challenges these institutions face in India. (Answer in 200 words) विकास वित्तीय संस्थान (DFIs) क्या हैं? भारत में इन संस्थानों के सामने आने वाली चुनौतियों पर विस्तार से चर्चा कीजिए। (उत्तर 200 ...

On: March 11, 2025 Comments: 0

Local Governance in India

The editorial discusses the financial constraints faced by Panchayats in India. Highlights issues stemming from weak devolution, reliance on central schemes, and poor fund utilization. Historical Context Democratic Decentralisation Evolution: Transitioned from colonial administration to constitutional self-governance. 73rd and 74th ...

On: March 11, 2025 Comments: 0

प्रभावी लोकतांत्रिक विकेंद्रीकरण की आवश्यकता

संपादकीय 09 मार्च 2025 को द हिंदू में प्रकाशित लेख पर आधारित है। लेख में पंचायतों के सामने आने वाली गंभीर वित्तीय बाधाओं पर चर्चा की गई है, जो कमज़ोर विकेंद्रीकरण, केंद्रीय योजनाओं पर निर्भरता, और अनुचित निधि उपयोग के ...

Explore Our Blog