Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Consider the importance of Article 32 of the Constitution’s Right to Constitutional Remedies in enabling citizens to pursue legal recourse for the infringement of their fundamental rights. Talk about how the Supreme Court and lower courts protect the rule of ...
Yes, Fundamental Rights are generally considered superior to Directive Principles of State Policy. Fundamental Rights are enforceable by courts, ensuring their protection against state infringement. They are enshrined as justiciable, meaning individuals can seek legal redress if these rights are vioRead more
Yes, Fundamental Rights are generally considered superior to Directive Principles of State Policy.
Fundamental Rights are enforceable by courts, ensuring their protection against state infringement. They are enshrined as justiciable, meaning individuals can seek legal redress if these rights are violated. This makes them legally binding on the state.
In contrast, Directive Principles are not-justiciable, meaning they cannot be directly enforced by courts through lawsuits. They serve as guidelines for the state to strive for, guiding its policies towards social and economic welfare. While important, they do not override individual rights.
However, it’s crucial to note that the relationship between these two isn’t always clear-cut. In certain cases, courts have interpreted Directive Principles to inform the meaning and scope of Fundamental Rights, indicating a degree of interdependency.
Ultimately, the supremacy of Fundamental Rights is established through their justiciability and the guarantee of individual liberties.
Fundamental rights are the basic rights which been provided in the Constitution as they can't be violate by any person though they have some exception However, these right not only assure a value of person but also safeguard the basic human values which indeed a important part of indian society A caRead more
Fundamental rights are the basic rights which been provided in the Constitution as they can’t be violate by any person though they have some exception
However, these right not only assure a value of person but also safeguard the basic human values which indeed a important part of indian society
A case of Right to education till Right go Privacy has shown that a person has all right to protect his and her dignity and also ask the government to provide the baisc survival requirements
See lessWhy was Right to property removed from being a fundamental right to a constitutional right?
Significance of the Right to Constitutional Remedies Under Article 32 Introduction Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Right to Constitutional Remedies, enabling citizens to seek judicial redress for violations of their Fundamental Rights. This right is crucial for the protection ofRead more
Significance of the Right to Constitutional Remedies Under Article 32
Introduction
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Right to Constitutional Remedies, enabling citizens to seek judicial redress for violations of their Fundamental Rights. This right is crucial for the protection of individual liberties and the enforcement of constitutional guarantees, serving as a mechanism for upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice.
Importance of Article 32
Role of the Supreme Court and High Courts
Recent Examples of Judicial Impact
Challenges in Enforcement
Conclusion
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is a fundamental safeguard that empowers citizens to seek judicial redress for violations of their Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court and High Courts play a crucial role in enforcing these rights and upholding the rule of law through their interpretations and judgments. While the judiciary has made significant strides in expanding and protecting rights, challenges such as case backlogs, accessibility issues, and institutional constraints need to be addressed to ensure that the Right to Constitutional Remedies remains effective and impactful. Strengthening the judicial system and enhancing public awareness are essential for reinforcing the constitutional guarantees and delivering justice to all citizens.
See less